PAC loss to BRADLEY: Would Legacy be Tarnished??

[-PBP-]

There is no shame in losing to Pac or Bradley. They are 2 of the best fighters in the world right now.

[IronDanHamza]

He's at the end of his career and already beaten Bradley easily twice so no.

[Zaroku]

There is no shame in losing to Pac or Bradley. They are 2 of the best fighters in the world right now.

Can't argue with that!!

But do you agree that some boxing fans might see PAC as less great than they thought he was??

If Bradley were to beat PAC up a bit, even if PAC wins, I would want PAC to retire.

[sicko]

NO! Meaningless fight, feels like a Exhibition to be honest Bradley could lose to Pacquiao again and yet still I would pick him to beat most of the other Welterweights

[Reloaded]

Its a no win for Bradley this time because Manny has a number of excuses just waiting to be used if Bradley wins .

[hugh grant]

Its a no win for Bradley this time because Manny has a number of excuses just waiting to be used if Bradley wins .

Well as long as he actually gets a legit win rather than judges just daylihght rob PAC that should be OK.
If PAC breaks his shoulder again or wears the wrong socks and Bradley gets the result thstsd still one better for desert storm

[hectari]

Hatton's first loss was to Floyd, messed up Hatton's mind. A first loss will do that to a boxer.

Maybe the standards are high for all top level boxers.

What does that say about floyds win over pacquiao? Floyd could barely do jack against an already exposed knocked out pacquiao who was past his best and had a shoulder issue.

Just like cotto was fresh when floyd fought him lol, but if pac fights him he is fighting a shot cotto.

If you like to say hatton lost to floyd first, why give credit to floyd? I notice you even said floyd exposed pacquiao get the *** out lol, he didnt expose crap jmm and morales exposed pac, if anything pac exposed floyd, pacquiao shown he was hard to hit clean, making him a defensive wizard compared other floyd opponents. The victory is tainted with pac being shot and ko, and washed up and floyd having an illegal iv.

You really making the same threads trying desperately to change peoples minds trying to hype up floyds weak win over pac.

[Reloaded]

Well as long as he actually gets a legit win rather than judges just daylihght rob PAC that should be OK.
If PAC breaks his shoulder again or wears the wrong socks and Bradley gets the result thstsd still one better for desert storm

It wont be ok because if Bradley wins the idiots will say it was the shoulder operation , Manny is shot blah blah , Manny for sure will mention something from cramps to period pains as he always has an excuse of some sort and the idiots alwas gobble it up .

You dont get any more resounding or clear cut than what JMM did to him yet idiots still cry how it was lucky and JMM was getting stopped .

Manny fanboys are the most immature fans on the planet and now the majority have jumped to GGG we get same BS from them with him .

[hugh grant]

It wont be ok because if Bradley wins the idiots will say it was the shoulder operation , Manny is shot blah blah , Manny for sure will mention something from cramps to period pains as he always has an excuse of some sort and the idiots alwas gobble it up .

You dont get any more resounding or clear cut than what JMM did to him yet idiots still cry how it was lucky and JMM was getting stopped .

Manny fanboys are the most immature fans on the planet and now the majority have jumped to GGG we get same BS from them with him .

But you don't get the fact that even if PAC makes excuses, its still a good win. PAC made excuses against Floyd but its still Floyd's best win.just like it was as great win for jmm, except that it took 4 attempts

[Zaroku]

What does that say about floyds win over pacquiao? Floyd could barely do jack against an already exposed knocked out pacquiao who was past his best and had a shoulder issue.

Just like cotto was fresh when floyd fought him lol, but if pac fights him he is fighting a shot cotto.

If you like to say hatton lost to floyd first, why give credit to floyd? I notice you even said floyd exposed pacquiao get the *** out lol, he didnt expose crap jmm and morales exposed pac, if anything pac exposed floyd, pacquiao shown he was hard to hit clean, making him a defensive wizard compared other floyd opponents. The victory is tainted with pac being shot and ko, and washed up and floyd having an illegal iv.

You really making the same threads trying desperately to change peoples minds trying to hype up floyds weak win over pac.

Too Manny Excuses PACman hurts himself when he attempts to mislead others.

I think Castillo & Maidana gave Floyd hell in the ring. But Too Manny Excuses PACman didn't .

But Timothy Bradley 3 isn't expected to be a challenge the Manny. If Bradley does win decisively, it may cause some fans to doubt PAC's greatness.

I wonder if PAC can KO Bradley without his Ariza shakes.