Link ?
Or will we have to wait for the legal proceedings to play out in order to confirm that ?
Look if you're right, then I agree..... although it is hard to imagine why a company would intentionally burn $200mil.
Don't they have shareholders ?
Whether they are currently running at a profit or not, I would be highly surprised if they cannot prove the profitability - therefore validity - of their LONG-TERM business model to a judge, and if necessary, jury.
They likely have some real good deals in place, no way did Shotime take " 45% " of the PPV revenue from the Mayweather/Pacquiao fight.
Mayweather is too smart for that, and so is Haymon.
I would much rather the money go to the fighters than to the greedy networks and promoters.
Arum fleeced Pacquiao on that fight.
Or will we have to wait for the legal proceedings to play out in order to confirm that ?
Look if you're right, then I agree..... although it is hard to imagine why a company would intentionally burn $200mil.
Don't they have shareholders ?
Whether they are currently running at a profit or not, I would be highly surprised if they cannot prove the profitability - therefore validity - of their LONG-TERM business model to a judge, and if necessary, jury.
They likely have some real good deals in place, no way did Shotime take " 45% " of the PPV revenue from the Mayweather/Pacquiao fight.
Mayweather is too smart for that, and so is Haymon.
I would much rather the money go to the fighters than to the greedy networks and promoters.
Arum fleeced Pacquiao on that fight.
Comment