Jordan turned back on Ward to sign GGG...

[TheUntouchable]

He's a Cruiser Weight out of Grand Rapids, MI who just got beat by Isiah Thomas.

Ah, I remember him!

[MrRolltide91]

They aint letting go of ward

[zerosixthree]

You know the state of Golovkin's or Wards's finances or commercial support for better or for worse doesn't in any way make you life any better, right?

I'm saying, if you need either Ward or Golovkin to succeed or fail to feel a sense of validation you really need to take a good look at yourself and the choices you are making with your lives. Especially if that validation comes from some small "victory" over a group of anonymous boxing forum denizens.

Seriously, turn off your computer and go live for yourself rather than vicariously through others.

[M Bison]

https://www.youtube.com/all_comments...&v=jAXJK6jiRu4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAXJK6jiRu4

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/box...-at-154160-168

http://www.thesweetscience.com/news/...wn-by-the-10th

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17dZVn1oR7o

would you like some more sources?

Can you read?
I clearly said post me evidence of GGG saying he destroys everyone whatever weight class you said
You just prove that you can't do it.

[Scipio2009]

my god you are such a douche.

"Golovkin-Lemieux met or exceeded every benchmark of success which was set going into the event," Taffet told ESPN.com.


Everyone knows the break even was around 150k buys, so that statement right there is good enough for me. If you and Glaser want to sit around with your tin foil hats on and discuss conspiracy theories while you jack off into each others mouths, thats your business.

Taffet never even feigned to mention a number for the Golovkin fight, yet he was more than willing to put his neck out there and say that Cotto-Alvarez did at least 900k ppv buys, waiting past the ten-day initial window generally needed to come up with solid initial projections.

I'm not laying my hat on Glazer's numbers, but the fact that Tom Loeffler is the only source putting his name behind the 150k ppv number, and he was the promoter of the event, makes the "just made my stated break-even number" even more bull****. The PPV, when the count actually happened, likely sold around 110k PPV buys, obviously lost money, and HBO's PPV guy was able to rationalize taking that L because sports fans in the #1 and #3 media markets were otherwise occupied.

For a "former promoter", you sure do support some bull**** notions.

[The Problem Child]

SON Of Gennady REKT and humiliated. LMAO!!! I love to see that low life boring son of a ***** coward fail in life. **** him so hard bahahahahaha. Hate that fake ass coward.

[Nubia]

How did they turn their backs on Ward? Are you implying Jordan is only allowed to sponsor one boxer?

Who do you think they'd rather represent anyhow? The widely considered P4P #1 or #2 or the guy who just did 97k on PPV and refuses to fight anyone of note in or around his division?

[OnePunch]

Taffet never even feigned to mention a number for the Golovkin fight, yet he was more than willing to put his neck out there and say that Cotto-Alvarez did at least 900k ppv buys, waiting past the ten-day initial window generally needed to come up with solid initial projections.

I'm not laying my hat on Glazer's numbers, but the fact that Tom Loeffler is the only source putting his name behind the 150k ppv number, and he was the promoter of the event, makes the "just made my stated break-even number" even more bull****. The PPV, when the count actually happened, likely sold around 110k PPV buys, obviously lost money, and HBO's PPV guy was able to rationalize taking that L because sports fans in the #1 and #3 media markets were otherwise occupied.

For a "former promoter", you sure do support some bull**** notions.

sure, sure, because YOU'RE such an expert, and industry insider.

lol. And you have the nerve to question Rafael and Ioles reporting, but you make up numbers out of thin air.

But just for giggles, what sources do you have for your "110k" announcement? That would be NONE.

Face it, youre just a sad loser, getting on the internet everyday hoping to see bad news about a fighter you hate, as if somehow that will make your pathetic empty life somehow better.

And heres the real news: It doesnt matter if GGG did 97k, 110k, 150k, or 900k. He will still be on top of the middleweight division, and you'll still be a loser, on the outside looking in.

Keep living the dream, big shot. Keep living the dream.....

[Scipio2009]

sure, sure, because YOU'RE such an expert, and industry insider.

lol. And you have the nerve to question Rafael and Ioles reporting, but you make up numbers out of thin air.

But just for giggles, what sources do you have for your "110k" announcement? That would be NONE.

Face it, youre just a sad loser, getting on the internet everyday hoping to see bad news about a fighter you hate, as if somehow that will make your pathetic empty life somehow better.

And heres the real news: It doesnt matter if GGG did 97k, 110k, 150k, or 900k. He will still be on top of the middleweight division, and you'll still be a loser, on the outside looking in.

Keep living the dream, big shot. Keep living the dream.....

Dan Rafael and Kevin Iole, in their very own reporting, stated that they got their numbers becuse Tom Loeffler told them that those were the numbers; nothing more. If you want to act as if their sources went further than that, you're an idiot.

The "110k PPVs" was a simple deduction, based on the logic that promoters lie (when Stephen Espinoza came out and said that Mayweather-Guerrero barely broke the 1m PPV buys threshold, everyone panned him as drastically inflating the numbers; Tom Loeffler, a person who would only even get the PPV figures as secondhand info, comes out and says that the show did "just enough to break even" and everyone is supposed to simply accept that? lol).

Glaser doesn't have direct access to the tally (so his number is likely wrong), Loeffler doesn't have direct access to the tally (so his number is likely wrong), and the only person likely with the actual tally (Taffett) isn't willing to commit to saying anything more than "it met our expectations, even with competing against Mets-Cubs", when the same person was jumping for joy to give a preliminary number for Cotto-Alvarez.

Gennady Golovkin is an almost 34-year old middleweight, who has never fought anyone worth fighting, will likely never fight anyone worth fighting, and has failed to break through as even a "sorta star" after ten fights on HBO. facts, though.

Golovkin is "king of the middleweights" in one of the softest era for middleweight boxing; stand behind that if you want.

[OnePunch]

Dan Rafael and Kevin Iole, in their very own reporting, stated that they got their numbers becuse Tom Loeffler told them that those were the numbers; nothing more. If you want to act as if their sources went further than that, you're an idiot.

The "110k PPVs" was a simple deduction, based on the logic that promoters lie (when Stephen Espinoza came out and said that Mayweather-Guerrero barely broke the 1m PPV buys threshold, everyone panned him as drastically inflating the numbers; Tom Loeffler, a person who would only even get the PPV figures as secondhand info, comes out and says that the show did "just enough to break even" and everyone is supposed to simply accept that? lol).

Glaser doesn't have direct access to the tally (so his number is likely wrong), Loeffler doesn't have direct access to the tally (so his number is likely wrong), and the only person likely with the actual tally (Taffett) isn't willing to commit to saying anything more than "it met our expectations, even with competing against Mets-Cubs", when the same person was jumping for joy to give a preliminary number for Cotto-Alvarez.

Gennady Golovkin is an almost 34-year old middleweight, who has never fought anyone worth fighting, will likely never fight anyone worth fighting, and has failed to break through as even a "sorta star" after ten fights on HBO. facts, though.

Golovkin is "king of the middleweights" in one of the softest era for middleweight boxing; stand behind that if you want.

The man can only face those who are willing to climb in the ring with him, so yeah, I "stand behind" that.

And to hold it against him that its a "weak era" is just ******ed. Unless of course you truly believe the likes of Holmes, Taylor, Pavlik, Mullings, Echols, Allen, etc would have beaten him. Even you arent dumb enough to believe that. Besides an argument for Jones or Toney, You'd have to go all the way back to the Hagler, Leonard, Hearns, Duran era to find a middleweight that you could reasonably pick as a favorite to beat him.

Do yourself a favor. Ignore his skin color and just enjoy watching a special talent do his thing.