Who's the WBA middleweight champion, Golovkin or Jacobs?

[The Big Dunn]

The truth is'nt petty, but providing no context for that truth is. Before the Lemieux fight I would of gave this argument some weight, but now just no. He has proven himself more than deserving of the two straps he currently holds.

Anyways it seems I may have missed a step or two in this debate that may of been in another thread. If so, I apologise if I was a bit out of line.

No, you are spot on. Look, I know I can be a prick from time to time and have spent a lot of keyboard strokes taking shots.

I'm not mad at you.

I just think posters shouldn't pick and choose which corrupt practices of the WBA they get mad at.

Jacobs shouldn't have been in a "title "fight with Fletcher for a "vacant" belt and GGG shouldn't have been elevated fro interim to regular champ either.

[Pigeons]

And for what reasons was he elevated? Just for the hell of it or because literally two guys refused to fight him?

Yes, we know. Everyone in boxing is afraid of Gennady Golovkin. The scariest and bravest fighter in the game today. All hail the Kazakh warrior. He's either beaten or been blatantly ducked by every fighter in or around his weight class for a decade now.

[OnePunch]

yes GGG just became the number 1 contender... while Sturm became the Super champion...

that's what I had explained before

GGG was mando BEFORE the nunez fight, not after, but now this is getting tiring.

I mean, are we really arguing over who was #1 or #2 to Sturm 5 ****ing years ago?? Seriously? Thats the point of contention?

ok fine you win. GGG was rated #25, not #1

[HeroBando]

No, you are spot on. Look, I know I can be a prick from time to time and have spent a lot of keyboard strokes taking shots.

I'm not mad at you.

I just think posters shouldn't pick and choose which corrupt practices of the WBA they get mad at.

Jacobs shouldn't have been in a "title "fight with Fletcher for a "vacant" belt and GGG shouldn't have been elevated fro interim to regular champ either.

I don't see why not. Regular champ Sturm didn't wanna fight interim champ mando so paid to get himself promoted to super. Then the two top contenders refused to fight Ggg for vacant regular title and he fought some ranked bum for it

[Chrismart]

looking at the poll results, I guess its safe to say.......

[Jsmooth9876]

Why do Golovkin-haters refuse to use spell-check?

They do but even their spell check is dumb.

[_Maxi]

Lara is. Both Golovkin and Jacobs are posers.

[-PBP-]

they use that "defenses" thing to pump up his average azz resume...make him seem like a monster

He didn't even beat the champion for the belt.


Oh yea.....Hopkins holds no middleweight record for defenses. Carlos Monzon does with 14....Hopkins only defended the title 6 times as lineal and undefeated champion.


At this point, the belts don't even matter especially at 160 because the best haven't fought each other yet


the WBA champion is and will be the winner of Jacobs vs GGG.....If he cant get the other guys in the ring, GGG could rid us of a regular champion and super one at the same time

Man stop it. I wonder if you even believe the **** you just wrote.

[OnePunch]

Lara is. Both Golovkin and Jacobs are posers.

I know youre being sarcastic, but you have to pick someone other than Lara. He was the 154 interim champ and got elevated to full champ so according to Dunn he is now a nobody with no credentials.

[deanrw]

Since GGG was born a champion, I say he has had 34 successful middleweight defences. Best record of all time