Originally posted by nivek535
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Kovalev a better fighter then Pacquiao??
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostWhile size isn't the be all end all, it matters.
Just because Kovalev can beat Pacquiao doesn't mean he's a better fighter than Pacquiao, just means he is a heck of a lot bigger and stronger. Nobody in their right mind will say when it's all said and done that a guy like say Devon Alexander is better than Ivan Calderon just because if they met on the street he might beat him. Ivan is clearly the superior fighter
Or if you want you can just say said fighter is better skilled.
but imagine this, the boxing world has no weight classes.
some 200lber is challenged by a 120lber.
120lber loses,
whos the "better boxer"? obviously the winner. because in THIS hypothetical case, physical attributes/genetics are factors in classifying a good boxer from bad lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by nivek535 View Postso the real debate here is about english lol.
but imagine this, the boxing world has no weight classes.
some 200lber is challenged by a 120lber.
120lber loses,
whos the "better boxer"? obviously the winner. because in THIS hypothetical case, physical attributes/genetics are factors in classifying a good boxer from bad lol
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Rip Chudd View PostWell then i'm better than Pacquiao, he wouldn't be able to handle my 6'6 235lb frame. Heck i'm better than Floyd tooOriginally posted by LarryXXX View PostSo Tyson Fury is better the Sugar Ray Robinson
what im saying is
IN EL BLANCO'S CLAIM,
IF there were no weight divisions,
THEN kovalev is a better fighter than pacquiao.
to add to that, both names probably wouldn't even make it to the sport if there were no weight divisions.
i am simply CLARIFYING his CLAIM here.
calm down warriors lol
Comment
Comment