Is Kovalev a better fighter then Pacquiao??

[Mr. Philadel]

Pac is the better fighter....CLEARLY!!!!...Krusher would get KTFO by Stiverne but Krusher is the better fighter....that's boxing....looking at it from a different angle would no longer be considered BOXING talk....its more like kindergarten kids saying the Hulk is better than Superman lol

[BoxingIsGreat]

P4P means if the boxers were the same size. I think that's what Larry meant. In that case, I'd take Pacuiao easily. He's more skilled and a much better boxer. Look at the poll!

[El-blanco]

What the hell is going on bro? I read the thread title and almost flipped out. Post what you really meant so we can clear all speculation

Pac is the better fighter....CLEARLY!!!!...Krusher would get KTFO by Stiverne but Krusher is the better fighter....that's boxing....looking at it from a different angle would no longer be considered BOXING talk....its more like kindergarten kids saying the Hulk is better than Superman lol

Yes, it's boxing talk, not reality talk. That was all my point was. Larry being the b1tch he is had to go and run to make a thread about it. His crackhead ass should be more concerned with learning the difference between "then," and "than."

[BoxingIsGreat]

[QUOTE=El-blanco;16330184] That was all my point was. Larry being the b1tch he is had to go and run to make a thread about it. His crackhead ass should be more concerned with learning the difference between "then," and "than."

Compare the above to this. I edited for you. Still not good:

That was all my point. Larry being the b1tch he had to go and run to make a thread about it.

Well, while criticizing Larry's English, look at yours! I think you are the b1tch here, and your argument doesn't make any sense.

[El-blanco]

[QUOTE=BoxingIsGreat;16330200]

That was all my point was. Larry being the b1tch he is had to go and run to make a thread about it. His crackhead ass should be more concerned with learning the difference between "then," and "than."

Compare the above to this. I edited for you. Still not good.:

That was all my point. Larry being the b1tch he had to go and run to make a thread about it.

Well, while criticizing Larry's English, look at yours! I think you are the b1tch here, and your argument doesn't make any sense.

You think that What you wrote is correct? Go read what I wrote very slowly. All you did was leave out "is" which is necessary to the sentence. Lol. Unreal

[BoxingIsGreat]

[QUOTE=El-blanco;16330202]

You think that What you wrote is correct? Go read what I wrote very slowly. All you did was leave out "is" which is necessary to the sentence. Lol. Unreal

"That was all my point was"? That's ****ed up English. The "is" doesn't belong, either.

[El-blanco]

"That was all my point was"? That's ****ed up English. The "is" doesn't belong, either.

Haha ****off ****** ****boy. You don't even know how to quote properly.

[-Kev-]

So Tyson Fury is better the Sugar Ray Robinson

Better? yes, not more accomplished doe.

This same guy told me just earlier, that I don't anything about boxing because of my views on GGG and Gonzalez. Now I see he posts this. Smh.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Haha ****off ****** ****boy. You don't even know how to quote properly.

You talk like a defeated loser. I won't descend to your level. I will bet you $100 if anybody (unless they are ****** like you) agrees that "is had" can ever go together. Maybe you meant "has had" but, in that context, that's still incorrect.

Cheers

[El-blanco]

You talk like a defeated loser. I won't descend to your level. I will bet you $100 if anybody (unless they are ****** like you) agrees that "is had" can ever go together. Maybe you meant "has had" but, in that context, that's still incorrect.

Cheers

You're the guy who nit picked that I left out a comma. Something you didn't even pick up on, genius. Go away alt.