Is Kovalev a better fighter then Pacquiao??

[-Kev-]

What's even worse is if these guys mean it in a literal sense. Like Kovalev as he stands, 6 foot whatever, 190lbs, beats Pacquiao at 5' 6" 148lbs. I mean that's even worse, you are pointing out the obvious. And you are pointing things that are irrelevant in determining who are the best fighters. Contrary to a "boxing geek", that sounds like a boxing dumbass. Pretty much equivalent to trying to explain to a super casual who asks why didn't Manny Pacquiao and Mike Tyson ever fought. Like really? And who's better Tyson or Pacquiao, and having to hear the casual say Tyson is better because he would win.

With this logic, it is very possible that Tyson Fury is the GOAT. Because at his size, and his agility and speed in relation to his size, many of those 6'5" and shorter HW's of the past would be no match for him, on sheer size and height to skill alone. One of the dumbest boxing arguments I have ever seen on this website. Has to be top 10 worst debates ever.

[IronDanHamza]

What's even worse is if these guys mean it in a literal sense. Like Kovalev as he stands, 6 foot whatever, 190lbs, beats Pacquiao at 5' 6" 148lbs. I mean that's even worse, you are pointing out the obvious. And you are pointing things that are irrelevant in determining who are the best fighters. Contrary to a "boxing geek", that sounds like a boxing dumbass. Pretty much equivalent to trying to explain to a super casual who asks why didn't Manny Pacquiao and Mike Tyson ever fought. Like really? And who's better Tyson or Pacquiao, and having to hear the casual say Tyson is better because he would win.

With this logic, it is very possible that Tyson Fury is the GOAT. Because at his size, and his agility and speed in relation to his size, many of those 6'5" and shorter HW's of the past would be no match for him, on sheer size and height to skill alone. One of the dumbest boxing arguments I have ever seen on this website. Has to be top 10 worst debates ever.

And what makes things worse is the guy thinks you're ******ed if you don't agree with him

[Chuckguy]

I agree Kovolev destroys PAC!
Kovo comes in at 175 and PAC and 145 a measly 30 lb weight advantage.
PAC can't beat him so he obviously isn't better than him simple science guys

Seriously???

[boxinggod101]

Ive heard it all on this forum lol. Thats the dumbest **** I ever read here.

[Doctor_Tenma]

And so the bigger guys must also have the better career since they've fought the bigger guys, no?

So flawed

[Larry the boss]

Yes, it's boxing talk, not reality talk. That was all my point was. Larry being the b1tch he is had to go and run to make a thread about it. His crackhead ass should be more concerned with learning the difference between "then," and "than."

He keeps calling me a crackhead and he has done powder as well..hilarious

[Suckmedry]

One of the dumbest boxing arguments I have ever seen on this website. Has to be top 10 worst debates ever.

The only sensible comment i read in this thread

[Weltschmerz]

Well this bait thread worked.

[hectari]

Pacquiao is obviously better, skill wise and athleticism, but the size advantage is the huge difference, lol of course in a real fight no way pacquiao wins that obvious, but p4p if they were the same size? Kovalev might die, imagine a 175 pound, 6 foot 2 pacquiao with the same ferocity, speed, skill and stamina launching that missle left down the pipe? Damm scary.

[kidbazooka]

basically what the poster is saying
heavyweights are the real "best boxers".
anyone below cruisers are basically "little leagues of NBA" etc...
which is absolutely true in my opinion.

Well those little leagues are ****ting all over the "big leagues ".

Just ask two little guys named Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao and the next big ppv star is also a "little guy named Canelo Alvarez.

Hw are horrible now a days they struggle to throw a proper combination, very sad to be honest.