Boxrec Ranks Canelo Alvarez as #1
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
You think Wlad was the p4p #1 fighter??? haha. He wasn't even top 10. He was a lie, a fouler, clincher, etc. He wasn't that good at all.
Do you want to know my opinion about Wlad? see this http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=689810
I called it two months ago.Comment
-
Well done, but the likes of Dan Rafael had Wlad as p4p #1 as did many others.You think Wlad was the p4p #1 fighter??? haha. He wasn't even top 10. He was a lie, a fouler, clincher, etc. He wasn't that good at all.
Do you want to know my opinion about Wlad? see this http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=689810
I called it two months ago.Comment
-
i mean, he handled cotto with some semblance of ease. surely that's better than anything chocolatito, GGG or kovalev have done.
one or 2, it doesn't matter. chocolatito has gallo on his resume and canelo has cotto. i've got no problem with it.Comment
-
Comment
-
I wouldn't call that "calling a fight".You ridiculed him.Nothing in there to say he was going to get beat off FuryYou think Wlad was the p4p #1 fighter??? haha. He wasn't even top 10. He was a lie, a fouler, clincher, etc. He wasn't that good at all.
Do you want to know my opinion about Wlad? see this http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=689810
I called it two months ago.Comment
-
What I called is that he was nowhere near the top10 p4p list.
The lose to Fury was just a consecuence of that. He could not clinch/bully Fury. But it was an awful fight. None of both are top quality. Fury doesn't belong to the top 10 either, that's my point too. I'm not saying he's a bum but no way he's in the list.Comment
-
Comment
Comment