Do you even read the nonsense that spews out of your mind? Roy Jones suffered brutal KO losses at the tail end of his career, Marquez did not. In fact, Marquez has never been KO'ed once, so your comparison is faulty. Furthermore, how does a guy lose a round that he KO'ed his opponent in? Lol. As for the absurd 10-2 scorecard, only nuthuggers such as yourself would take it seriously.
There was also a judge that scored the fight 7-5 for Pacquiao, but that doesn't help your silly argument now does it? Regardless, only an idiot would consider a judges scorecard to be unquestionably true. The fact is, it wasn't an easy win for Floyd, he was visibly hurt in the 4th and 6th round, despite Pacquiao entering the fight with a pre-existing injury.
Carry on with your nuthugging.
You are truly ****** lol. Did you not see the beating Marquez took in round six? If he didn't score a ko in that round he would have lost that round as well. Even Nacho said Marquez lost every round but the 3rd. So do you know more that Nacho? Doubt it.
Just because you've been KO'd doesn't mean you're over the hill. Pacquiao was brutally KO'd twice at the beginning of his career and still went on to have a great career. Age is the biggest determining factor of where a fighter is in a stage in his career. Then number of wars, etc. Marquez was pushing 40, took a beating in the fight with Pacquiao, and hasn't had a significant win since. But your dumbass states hes better now than he was in 2009? How? Because he looked cut up at a weigh in?
What judge gave Pacquiao a win for 7-5? It wasnt an official judge nor the HBO or ShowTime judges. Even many of Pac's fans on here thought he lost that fight. Dont make me laugh. All three judges had Floyd winning 10 to 2 after reviewing the fight. I personally scored it 9 to 3. Heck man, even Freddie thinks Manny lost.
You are truly ****** lol. Did you not see the beating Marquez took in round six? If he didn't score a ko in that round he would have lost that round as well. Even Nacho said Marquez lost every round but the 3rd. So do you know more that Nacho? Doubt it.
Just because you've been KO'd doesn't mean you're over the hill. Pacquiao was brutally KO'd twice at the beginning of his career and still went on to have a great career. Age is the biggest determining factor of where a fighter is in a stage in his career. Then number of wars, etc. Marquez was pushing 40, took a beating in the fight with Pacquiao, and hasn't had a significant win since. But your dumbass states hes better now than he was in 2009? How? Because he looked cut up at a weigh in?
What judge gave Pacquiao a win for 7-5? It wasnt an official judge nor the HBO or ShowTime judges. Even many of Pac's fans on here thought he lost that fight. Dont make me laugh. All three judges had Floyd winning 10 to 2 after reviewing the fight. I personally scored it 9 to 3. Heck man, even Freddie thinks Manny lost.
"Marquez said during a phone-patch with reporters on Tuesday (Wednesday in Manila) that he is in the best shape of his career."
Straight from the horse's mouth. Would you kindly stfu now?
LOL so? De La Hoya said the same thing before his fight with Floyd. Years later he says he was too old. Fighters always say "I'm in the shape of my life" If Marquez had lost he would turn around and say his camp ******. Fighters always do that. Try again numbskull.
LOL so? De La Hoya said the same thing before his fight with Floyd. Years later he says he was too old. Fighters always say "I'm in the shape of my life" If Marquez had lost he would turn around and say his camp ******. Fighters always do that. Try again numbskull.
Grasping at straws isn't going to change the fact that you lost this debate, but if it helps you cope with the reality of failure, then by all means, have at it. There's no point in arguing any further, it's become sadly apparent that you're far too ****** to realize when you're wrong.
Grasping at straws isn't going to change the fact that you lost this debate, but if it helps you cope with the reality of failure, then by all means, have at it. There's no point in arguing any further, it's become sadly apparent that you're far too ****** to realize when you're wrong.
My friend, you lost this argument. Just look at the other posters clowning you in this thread. Straight from the horses mouth? LMAO How about Marquez saying for five years Floyd was superior to Manny? Are you going to acknowledge that?
My friend, you lost this argument. Just look at the other posters clowning you in this thread. Straight from the horses mouth? LMAO How about Marquez saying for five years Floyd was superior to Manny? Are you going to acknowledge that?
What sparked this debate was you foolishly thinking that Marquez was in better shape for the Floyd fight than he was for Pacquiao. I completely destroyed your faulty argument and now the nuthugger inside you is attempting to turn this into a "Floyd is superior to Manny" discussion.
What sparked this debate was you foolishly thinking that Marquez was in better shape for the Floyd fight than he was for Pacquiao. I completely destroyed your faulty argument and now the nuthugger inside you is attempting to turn this into a "Floyd is superior to Manny" discussion.
This is you right now.
You haven't proven jack ****. 2009 Marquez went on to win several fights and some by KO. 2012 Marquez has only had one significant win since. LOL you can't tell me he is better in 2012 than he was three years earlier. Having muscles doesn't mean you'll perform better. Like I said, Floyd is also more cut u than he used to be but he is not better than he used to be. Give it up
You haven't proven jack ****. 2009 Marquez went on to win several fights and some by KO. 2012 Marquez has only had one significant win since. LOL you can't tell me he is better in 2012 than he was three years earlier. Having muscles doesn't mean you'll perform better. Like I said, Floyd is also more cut u than he used to be but he is not better than he used to be. Give it up
Comment