Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Amir Khan ranked higher than Danny Garcia?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by FlatLine View Post
    Khan could legitimately be considered the number 1 at welterweight, he forced Mayweather to retire, basically a checkmate move in chess. Pacquiao is likely going to duck him and retire too in all probability. Not that he's fought the best possible opponents, but he tried to make fights with two of the very best at the weight and they both ducked. This means that Khan's attempts to prove he was the best couldn't happen because the perceived "best" fighters avoided him, and prevented him from proving it in the ring.

    If you're making these top level guys duck and ultimately retire you could legitimately be placed above them all to be fair to the kid. Is it time for Khan to be universally recognized as the King of 147 at least for the time being until his ascension to 154?
    Khan won't win a title at 154.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by fanofslug View Post
      I was looking at The Ring's current rankings and noticed Khan is ranked 3 welterweight and Garcia is ranked number 9? Garcia has no losses, Khan has 3 loss and Garcia knocked out Khan. Why is this so?

      Here is the link to the Ring rankings: http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/welterweight
      question should be why is Khan ranked #3 period

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
        question should be why is Khan ranked #3 period
        are you serious? you obviously don't know **** about boxing.

        Khan's best win at welterweight is Devon Alexander or Chris Algieri. How many other welterweights can even compare to that? He could arguably be #1 at welterweight with Floyd (and excluding Pacquiao) retired.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
          are you serious? you obviously don't know **** about boxing.

          Khan's best win at welterweight is Devon Alexander or Chris Algieri. How many other welterweights can even compare to that? He could arguably be #1 at welterweight with Floyd (and excluding Pacquiao) retired.
          No he couldn't.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
            But Khan won the first round doe. LMAO but seriously Lamont is better than anybody Khan has beaten at WW. However Lamont hasn't done anything at WW either so the rankings are justified.


            I guess Oscar wasn't fooled by that "win".

            .

            Comment


            • #26
              bruh

              Originally posted by VG_Addict View Post
              No he couldn't.
              /sarcasm

              Comment


              • #27
                Not everything is about loses, I swear some people are hanged on undefeated records.

                Comment


                • #28
                  new to boxing huh?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
                    are you serious? you obviously don't know **** about boxing.

                    Khan's best win at welterweight is Devon Alexander or Chris Algieri. How many other welterweights can even compare to that? He could arguably be #1 at welterweight with Floyd (and excluding Pacquiao) retired.
                    Chris Algeri had 0 wins at ww and was coming off of a loss..why even list that?

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
                      bruh



                      /sarcasm
                      Well maybe you should have given a hint you were being sarcastic. It wouldn't have taken much more effort to put a sarcasm tag at the end.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP