Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
View Post
your rhetoric seems to always go back to the idea that you think klitschko was prime when he fought fury.
he threw more than twice the amount of total punches against haye that he did against fury. you can attribute that to the great tyson fury if you want. it will be you and the brits. the rest of us recognize that wladimir klitschko was 40 years old and had been slipping arguably since emanuel steward died several years ago. he was shot by the time fury got to him.
have fun thinking that fury got the best klitshcko. i havenn't seen you once recognize how far he'd deteriorated. concession is the lifeblood of arguing. i can't take you seriously if you're a fanboy. it's not logical to discount the deterioration. i can't make a horse drink.
Comment