Glaser reporting 650,000k buys for Cotto-Canelo........

[ИATAS]

Come on Natas-he said Floyd sold less than what was reported so NSB gave him instant credibility.

And he said GGG-Lemeiux did 97k, Canelo-Cotto under 650k, etc. Every PPV he tweets or facebooks some number well below the official numbers without having a source and everyone runs with it IF it fits their agenda (anti floyd fans, anti ggg fans, anti cotto/canelo fans, etc. etc. etc). NSB is so gullible. I'd understand if it was someone halfway credible but this guy is one of the biggest slimeballs in boxing. It's embarrassing that NSB gives him so much traffic (people check his facebook/twitter because we talk about it).

[ИATAS]

The 2 biggest names in boxing are doing lower numbers than Rousey and Holm.

Sad days.

According to an unreliable person with an extremely shady past without a source.

[STAX ON DECK]

didnt margs cotto II do 800k??

if so canelo cotto clearly did 900k,i bleieve it

650k is too low

[OnePunch]

didnt margs cotto II do 800k??

if so canelo cotto clearly did 900k,i bleieve it

650k is too low

500-600k, depending who you ask

[STREET CLEANER]

A pity because on paper that was a good match up

[Chuckguy]

Those are horrible numbers for 2 of the top four boxing attractions. Oh well

[The Big Dunn]

And he said GGG-Lemeiux did 97k, Canelo-Cotto under 650k, etc. Every PPV he tweets or facebooks some number well below the official numbers without having a source and everyone runs with it IF it fits their agenda (anti floyd fans, anti ggg fans, anti cotto/canelo fans, etc. etc. etc). NSB is so gullible. I'd understand if it was someone halfway credible but this guy is one of the biggest slimeballs in boxing. It's embarrassing that NSB gives him so much traffic (people check his facebook/twitter because we talk about it).

True, he deserves no credibility but once he gave a low number for Floyd the anti Floyd set gave him instant cred. SO when he reports subsequent numbers its kind of hard for those same people to claim the number isn't valid.

The moral of the story-Floyd haters need not support everything that they think makes Floyd look bad.

[OnePunch]

True, he deserves no credibility but once he gave a low number for Floyd the anti Floyd set gave him instant cred. SO when he reports subsequent numbers its kind of hard for those same people to claim the number isn't valid.

The moral of the story-Floyd haters need not support everything that they think makes Floyd look bad.

and the flip side is true. Those that disputed the Floyd-Berto number, were all too quick to post their "but but but 97k doe" nonsense lol

[The Big Dunn]

and the flip side is true. Those that disputed the Floyd-Berto number, were all too quick to post their "but but but 97k doe" nonsense lol

No man, this isn't one of those it's everyone's fault thing. The anti Floyd set gave glazer credibility and then tried to make him nothing once he said Manny/Algieri sold nothing.

Its the same as the "not taking VADA= dirty" logic, until Kov didn't take VADA.

Hating Floyd has caused some people to go full ******.

That's why when I first saw 97k from Glazer I said you can't take him seriously.

[OnePunch]

No man, this isn't one of those it's everyone's fault thing. The anti Floyd set gave glazer credibility and then tried to make him nothing once he said Manny/Algieri sold nothing.

Its the same as the "not taking VADA= dirty" logic, until Kov didn't take VADA.

Hating Floyd has caused some people to go full ******.

That's why when I first saw 97k from Glazer I said you can't take him seriously.

and I wasnt referring to you. There are PLENTY of people on this forum who dismiss Glazers Floyd numbers but hang onto the "97k doe" thing as if their life depended on it. They cant wait to find threads to say it in......lol