I am not IMDAZED, so please don't group me with anybody. I speak for myself and post under my real name.
We don't know the specifics of how Haymon structured the deal with W&R, but would you agree it's safe to assume that W&R owns a stake in whatever companies handle Haymon's boxing managerial business?
And therefore, it's not a question of the management fee going to Haymon or W&R, it would go to the COMPANY, which Haymon and W&R own. How much each owns, we have no idea.
I'm glad you had fun running shows. God bless ya. I can appreciate someone loving something so much that they want to be a part of it, whether it's financially prudent or not.
But for me, the fight business is how I eat and I care if I lose $1, let alone $5,000. I have no emotional attachment to any of this. It's just business. So our perspectives may be different here. Personally, once guns were invented, I think it was pretty ****** to still care about who was the best "fighter." But as long as people care, might as well make money off them.
I think it's safe to assume they own "something", but what that is, who the heck knows? It could be back end loaded for all we know. I dont know. You dont know. And those other 2 clowns certainly dont know either. Too bad it took 50 posts for us to reach that conclusion lol.
And I always post under my real name as well. Im not ashamed of my opinions, and dont much care what people think of me lol
I think it's safe to assume they own "something", but what that is, who the heck knows? It could be back end loaded for all we know. I dont know. You dont know. And those other 2 clowns certainly dont know either. Too bad it took 50 posts for us to reach that conclusion lol.
And I always post under my real name as well. Im not ashamed of my opinions, and dont much care what people think of me lol
It took YOU 50 posts to realize that. I posted that a few minutes after I posted the link.
Comment