Is Fury champion of the worst ever HW era?

[juggernaut666]

Damn you are beyond ******.

Thats not much coming from anyone who claims Klitchko won only ONE round....not only do you lie but you cant see straight either, being klitchko won no less than 4 rounds anyone who views the fight objectively would at least give him that...The REAL scores were 115/113..as many had it outside and inside of boxing who actually know how to judge a fight fairly and accurately...this does not include you simpleton.....even Battling Nelsons scores are more realistic being it actually was a hard fight to score first hand since it wasn't DOMINATED by EITHER you fool....even Fury thought the point deduction was enough to lose

[JJRod]

I'd like to congratulate Fury again, and his fans who are understandably over the moon about this.

But really, this is the worst ever HW era, right? Maybe Fury's accomplishment ain't even that special. Seems he will have nothing but bums and cans to defend against.

At least Fury is financially secured, good for him and his family.

They say this almost every time a new champion is crowned now. They once said Larry Holmes was the worst champ because of his lack of competition, said the same about Lennox, they said the same about Wlad, if Fury has a long run at HW they'll say the same until he retires.

[low blows]

I'd like to congratulate Fury again, and his fans who are understandably over the moon about this.

But really, this is the worst ever HW era, right? Maybe Fury's accomplishment ain't even that special. Seems he will have nothing but bums and cans to defend against.

At least Fury is financially secured, good for him and his family.

No way Jose. This era while not deep is clearly better than the Joe Louis era, Mike Tyson era and the mid 90's period when Foreman won the lineal title and let the all of his alphabet straps fly off his rotund waist because he was scared of losing to his various mandatory opponents.

[LacedUp]

Thats not much coming from anyone who claims Klitchko won only ONE round....not only do you lie but you cant see straight either, being klitchko won no less than 4 rounds anyone who views the fight objectively would at least give him that...The REAL scores were 115/113..as many had it outside and inside of boxing who actually know how to judge a fight fairly and accurately...this does not include you simpleton.....even Battling Nelsons scores are more realistic being it actually was a hard fight to score first hand since it wasn't DOMINATED by EITHER you fool....even Fury thought the point deduction was enough to lose

As I said, Klitschko barely won a round.

[Elroy1]

As I said, Klitschko barely won a round.

That's not true, come off it..

Many of the rounds were inseperable.

Obviously the judges gave those rounds to Fury was my first thought.

And in fact, as Juggernaut has provided evidence only ONE of the judges did that, the others had it fairly even!! (The way it actually was).

NEITHER guy could really get up on the other, Fury just got up some more..

He landed F/A against Wladimir really.

In a REAL Wlad fight you'd be calling Fury's efforts pathetic!

But because Wlad performed even MORE pathetic (as nuts would claim it based on pure punch outputs) it justifies the position you want to promote.

[////]

whats worst about it?

even elongated bums like wilder and dimitrenko would give them hell in the 70s and prior on pure range and strength

and no you don't get to "ignore" these things or do "p4p heavyweight rankings", that defeats the point of heavyweight

[juggernaut666]

As I said, Klitschko barely won a round.

The only excuse for that foolish response is you were "LACED "up when you watched it .....

[Elroy1]

The only excuse for that foolish response is you were "LACED "up when you watched it .....

[One Of A Kind]

Right, OK...

Such a masterclass, that he (and Wladimir) only connected with 20% of his punch output. Quality, masterful stuff, that.

I'm not taking anything away from Fury - his tactics, footwork and switching completely befuddled Wladimir - but it was by no means a dominant, quality, one-sided fight.

The Brits are losing their heads (as ever...)

How was it not dominant or one sided? Klitschko barely sc****d a round.

Back on topic though, the worst HW era just ended, and a new one is beginning.

[VG_Addict]

Are modern HWs really that much better?