Is Fury champion of the worst ever HW era?

[LacedUp]

That's not true, come off it..

Many of the rounds were inseperable.

Obviously the judges gave those rounds to Fury was my first thought.

And in fact, as Juggernaut has provided evidence only ONE of the judges did that, the others had it fairly even!! (The way it actually was).

NEITHER guy could really get up on the other, Fury just got up some more..

He landed F/A against Wladimir really.

In a REAL Wlad fight you'd be calling Fury's efforts pathetic!

But because Wlad performed even MORE pathetic (as nuts would claim it based on pure punch outputs) it justifies the position you want to promote.

To your uneducated eyes the rounds might have been equal. To the initiated, Fury was winning almost every round and there wasn't a single round you could solidly give to Wlad.

If I'm wrong please show me the round and why Wlad won.

This was a real Wlad fight, he just wasn't as good as you thought he was.

The only excuse for that foolish response is you were "LACED "up when you watched it .....

Lol what?

Damn that was bad.

[Weltschmerz]

whats worst about it?

even elongated bums like wilder and dimitrenko would give them hell in the 70s and prior on pure range and strength

and no you don't get to "ignore" these things or do "p4p heavyweight rankings", that defeats the point of heavyweight

What kind of resume's do these guys have, though? Apparently todays HW's are so piss poor they couldn't hang with any other era.