Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Fury champion of the worst ever HW era?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by yoz View Post
    Yup. I'm still in shock from the defeat... but it's amusing to see all the Brits claiming it was a one-sided 'masterclass'.


    How many rounds did you give wlad?

    Comment


    • #32
      A Klitschko fanboy all of a sudden complaining about the era being weak. ****ing priceless.

      You're embarrassing yourself out here.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
        A Klitschko fanboy all of a sudden complaining about the era being weak. ****ing priceless.

        You're embarrassing yourself out here.
        I think he is being sarcastic a bit, since all of a sudden the HW division is great all of a sudden based on one Wlad loss when it hasn't changed since Wlads reighn really.... The difference is instead of Wlad dominating you will have everyone losing to one another. Does this make it better? Not really but it makes it more competitive like a 70's era of B fighter beats c fighter and A fighter losses to D fighter... if it goes that route.With Wlads absence if he should leave soon it will make top guys fight top guys not just target Wlad.


        In short fury will be known as a good fighter while Wlad wont since he was to dominate and therefor fought weak opponents.....unfortunlty this is boxing majority mentality.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
          Wlad's era ended, this is a new one.

          You can't say he's the champion of the worst era ever, because his era has barely started. There are some good fighters coming up, but looking through the top 10 it's not great.

          But Wilder, Fury, Joshua, Povetkin and Klitschko. Those are 5 solid fighters.
          Every boxer has an era..what are you talking about? Eras are usually decided by the decade...his was 2000/2010...and beyond...He stepped into the other era and still was winning, and still may.

          You go by the dominant era champion...best example Mike Tyson and his 80's dominance..yet failed to do so in the 90's..as it belonged to Lewis.
          Last edited by juggernaut666; 11-30-2015, 04:36 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            I like Fury, real great guy but I can't help but think he would have left in an ambulance a few times had he fought in that 90's era that Wlad did.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
              Bravo

              Not many people would openly be an idiot on forums like you have been

              Wlad was clearly toyed with almost every round and lose almost every round

              Only a donkey would disagree, no analysis is needed for those who watched the fight

              I suggest you go watch it and stop being so but hurt
              Wow, you just keep giving. The British education system, eh...

              Let's remind people of your contributions to NSB. Here's a fantastic example, given in 2011:

              Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
              So many haters on here, this is the man who will travel to germany to fight the champ, he conceded to everything during negotiations just to get this fight made

              this truly is like rocky 4

              Haye will take the giant out, mark my words, for years the brothers have destroyed the division and fought fat, and unfit heavyweights

              haye is a supreme athlete, he has the heart of a lion, his power is unstoppable

              mark my words, haye will shock the world

              save the division haye

              save boxing
              Remind me - how did David Haye get on? Oh, and don't try to pass this off as an off quote. I remember, vividly, the drivel you used to come out with. You would think, after years of watching boxing, you'd learn something about the sport and perhaps learn how to score a fight... But, alas, this again is a sign of the British education system.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                How many rounds did you give wlad?
                I had most rounds even. That's not bias, it's just a reflection of how the fight played out. Both fighters had pathetically low connection rates.

                At the end, I had Fury up 2 rounds.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  Fury barely got out of 2nd gear and still played with Wlad and won 8-9 rounds on every scorecard.

                  In reality he won 10-11.

                  Wlad connected 4 punches a round and admitted he couldn't find the punches.

                  Yet here you are making excuses for him he or his team aren't even making.
                  What? You're quoting me, making reference to insults thrown by a Liverpudlian ******? Is that why you chose to respond - because you're a Liverpool fan? Poor form, my man, poor form.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    It is perhaps the worst era ever. It's looking to get a bit better though

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by yoz View Post
                      What? You're quoting me, making reference to insults thrown by a Liverpudlian ******? Is that why you chose to respond - because you're a Liverpool fan? Poor form, my man, poor form.
                      Eh no, I responded because you said the fight was close. Which it wasn't at all.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP