Cotto's next opponent. He's been dining out for a couple of years now beating that cripple Martinez, he might as well go all the way and smash the **** out of Hawking.
What are you talking about. Herrera outlanded Danny by overal punches and had a higher connect rate. And tripled the amount of jabs landed at a connect rate of 33%. None of which you can say for Cotto. How does that apply to what happened to Cotto. Look at the punch stats
Cotto v Canelo
629 Total punches thrown 484
129 Total punches connected 155
21% Percentage 32%
374 Total jabs thrown 186
54 Total jabs connected 37
14% Percentage 20%
255 Total power punches thrown 298
75 Total power punches connected 118
14% Percentage 40%
Literally nothing is the same as the Danny vs Herrera fight. Only thing is the same is both Herrerra and Cotto threw a ton of jabs. Difference is Herrerra actually connected. You don't get credit for throwing a ton of punches but miss 500 of the ones you throw. Canelo slipped his punches. Danny blocked Herreras punches with his face. Herrera landed 139 jabs alone. Cotto landed just 54 despite throwing almost 400 of them. How you expect to win a fight with your jab when you land that few at a 14% rate? lol
His jab was ineffective because of Canelo's defense and countering. And he was killed in the power punch department because he was scared to trade with Canelo for fear of being knocked out.
I could see giving the close rounds to Cotto. It's still 8-4 though.
That's fine everyone has their way of scoring the fight. But Cotto fans need to have some humility, its takes away from Cotto.
no everyone has their fav fighters. most people aren't consistent in scoring. if you notice in pac marquez 3 everyone claimed robbery when pac threw and landed a lot more but marquez landed cleaner. then in floyd-pac floyd threw and landed slightly more(compubox was trash as always) but pac landed much cleaner and most people still thought floyd won which was directly contrary to what they had been saying before. now in the cotto-canelo fight canelo landed cleaner and most people thought he won so its strange how they went along scoring based on clean punches until the floyd fight where they suddenly scored based on "outboxing" or "total punches" instead of quality of punch.
people should score based on who landed cleaner or they should score on some other criteria that they want to make up like who controlled who, who landed more without any nuance, but to go back and forth just reeks of bias.
no everyone has their fav fighters. most people aren't consistent in scoring. if you notice in pac marquez 3 everyone claimed robbery when pac threw and landed a lot more but marquez landed cleaner. then in floyd-pac floyd threw and landed slightly more(compubox was trash as always) but pac landed much cleaner and most people still thought floyd won which was directly contrary to what they had been saying before. now in the cotto-canelo fight canelo landed cleaner and most people thought he won so its strange how they went along scoring based on clean punches until the floyd fight where they suddenly scored based on "outboxing" or "total punches" instead of quality of punch.
people should score based on who landed cleaner or they should score on some other criteria that they want to make up like who controlled who, who landed more without any nuance, but to go back and forth just reeks of bias.
Styles make fights and not all fights look the same. I think Floyd clearly beat Manny.
Transcript of Miguel Radio Interview Re Alvarez fight & WBC conflict:
"Miguel Cotto fought pretty good".
"Oh yeah!! ... Miguel Cotto was ready."
"Miguel Cotto used some new moves."
"Check Miguel Cotto out"
"Ooohhh!!!!! Miguel Cotto did not go down."
"Canelo was a tough fighter, he hit so hard Miguel Cotto might have a compound fracture". "Miguel Cotto thought Miguel Cotto was going to go into shock!!
"Mig....Miguel Cotto WONT FORGET YOU Canelo"
"Miguel Cotto HOLDS GRUDGES."
"What happened with the WBC title and the $300,000, it was all a misunderstanding."
"Miguel Cotto doesn't like misunderstandings."
"Miguel Cotto and misunderstandings kinda clash."
"The WBC tried to steal Miguel Cotto's money".
"Jose Suliman is the guy who tried to sideline Miguel Cotto."
Jose Suliman, that's the guy who tried to take the bread out of Miguel Cotto's mouth."
"Now, Miguel Cotto's out of work because of Jose Sulliman".
"Miguel Cotto wants a piece of Jose Sulliman!"
"Miguel Cotto GONNA GET YOU Sulliman !!"
"Miguel Cotto's gettin upset".
"HANDS OFF Miguel Cotto!!. DON'T TOUCH Miguel Cotto! LET GO OF Miguel Cotto!!!"
no everyone has their fav fighters. most people aren't consistent in scoring. if you notice in pac marquez 3 everyone claimed robbery when pac threw and landed a lot more but marquez landed cleaner. then in floyd-pac floyd threw and landed slightly more(compubox was trash as always) but pac landed much cleaner and most people still thought floyd won which was directly contrary to what they had been saying before. now in the cotto-canelo fight canelo landed cleaner and most people thought he won so its strange how they went along scoring based on clean punches until the floyd fight where they suddenly scored based on "outboxing" or "total punches" instead of quality of punch.
people should score based on who landed cleaner or they should score on some other criteria that they want to make up like who controlled who, who landed more without any nuance, but to go back and forth just reeks of bias.
This is true. Canelo always steals rounds by landed 1 or 2 big shots from someone who outboxed the whole round. Look at the Trout fight, he takes a nap for the first 1:30 while Trout is boxing him landed his shots then Canelo wakes up and lands a couple big shots at the end to steal the rounds, its pathetic.
Coming from the guy who thinks Cotto legitimately won on Saturday
Obviously you have no idea what your talking about, just like your boxing knowledge. I already stated in multiple threads that I had Canelo winning the fight 7-5.
Obviously you have no idea what your talking about, just like your boxing knowledge. I already stated in multiple threads that I had Canelo winning the fight 7-5.
lol Ok because I said not all fights are scored the same and they may be scored based on different styles? Like every fight should be scored the same when there is a boxer vs a puncher? Fckng ******.
Comment