Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum Sounds Off on Lomachenko-Rigondeaux Possibility!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Rigondeuax is the one who has made ridiculous demands for this fight.

    Catchweights, rehydration clauses and now an unattainable purse.

    Yet you blame Bob Arum because of your petty allegiance to Mayweather/Haymon.



    ****** into believing what? It's a fight Dunn, not Santa Clause.

    Why would a fight between two double Olympic Gold Medalists not be floated?

    Because YOU don't want it to happen?
    no dirk, because of the circumstances involving it. I repeat had Loma Rigo been the plan then cool. Vevetka who he floated got signed by Al, which tells you he was in scramble mode to find an opponent rather than have Loma fight walters at 128 or 130.

    Arum and TR think Loma loses to Walters so they are not doing the fight. Arum promotes Walters and Loma but he is clearly picking the more lucrative fighters side. Ok, I understand that, but Walters deserves Arum's best same as Loma. If Loma loses, he loses. Instead, Arum is protecting him and used the fake idea of a rigo fight to do it. The audacity to ask rigo to do the same thing Loma wouldn't is farcical.

    All that said, at this point Rigo has nothing left at 122 and should move up. You are right about that. I hope he does, but I still hope he doesn't give Loma an out from Walters.

    Loma has nothing left at 126 now that the Rigo fight is dead. Politics will not allow for unification. So just man up and fight Walters as was the original plan.

    I do not think Rigo should help Arum and Loma out because they are scared to risk losing to Walters right now.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      no dirk, because of the circumstances involving it. I repeat had Loma Rigo been the plan then cool. Vevetka who he floated got signed by Al, which tells you he was in scramble mode to find an opponent rather than have Loma fight walters at 128 or 130.

      Arum and TR think Loma loses to Walters so they are not doing the fight. Arum promotes Walters and Loma but he is clearly picking the more lucrative fighters side. Ok, I understand that, but Walters deserves Arum's best same as Loma. If Loma loses, he loses. Instead, Arum is protecting him and used the fake idea of a rigo fight to do it. The audacity to ask rigo to do the same thing Loma wouldn't is farcical.

      All that said, at this point Rigo has nothing left at 122 and should move up. You are right about that. I hope he does, but I still hope he doesn't give Loma an out from Walters.

      Loma has nothing left at 126 now that the Rigo fight is dead. Politics will not allow for unification. So just man up and fight Walters as was the original plan.

      I do not think Rigo should help Arum and Loma out because they are scared to risk losing to Walters right now.
      There's nothing stopping Lomachenko fighting them both and if you were actually a boxing fan, you'd want to see that. Rigo at 126 and then Walters at 130.

      You're not a boxing fan though so I get why you're doing this. Remember, I know you. Your fake ass passive-aggressive posting style doesn't wash with me.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        There's nothing stopping Lomachenko fighting them both and if you were actually a boxing fan, you'd want to see that. Rigo at 126 and then Walters at 130.

        You're not a boxing fan though so I get why you're doing this. Remember, I know you. Your fake ass passive-aggressive posting style doesn't wash with me.
        Again, I have no problem if both fights are made. I just want what I was expecting-walters v loma-first. Then if he loses, Loma can go rebuild himself back by beating Rigo.

        You want the fake call out fight to happen before the planned fight. Now, There is no fake fight to fall back on.

        If you really wanted Loma v Rigo, why didn't you mention it at any point before Arum brought it up? Why did it take the fake call out for you to suddenly push for this fight?

        Now, you pretend this is about wanting to see these fights when the issue is Loma not fighting Walters. Once Loma fights Walters the Rigo fight is still there.

        As for being a fan, I've been a fan a lot longer than you. As usual, when your argument gets destroyed you try and switch it.

        my 1st post in the other thread was about me being hypocritical. you then proceeded to say the same thing. for months you claimed I was protecting LSC from rigo, then switched to say I was protecting rigo from Loma.

        Basically, you needed someone to talk to online and I gave you that. Next time, just say thanks Dunn for keeping me from hurting myself or someone else.

        There was literally nothing for us to be arguing about.
        Last edited by The Big Dunn; 11-24-2015, 09:15 AM.

        Comment


        • At this point, all the Rigo haters can say whatever the hell they want. **** him. I was so happy for the dude when I heard he was gonna be on the PPV. I had got home right in time to make my first drink as his fight began. Smh when I saw how he was going about things, I was so pissed. I was just there like wtf is he doing??

          Comment


          • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
            Again, I have no problem if both fights are made. I just want what I was expecting-walters v loma-first. Then if he loses, Loma can go rebuild himself back by beating Rigo.

            You want the fake call out fight to happen before the planned fight. Now, There is no fake fight to fall back on.

            If you really wanted Loma v Rigo, why didn't you mention it at any point before Arum brought it up? Why did it take the fake call out for you to suddenly push for this fight?

            Now, you pretend this is about wanting to see these fights when the issue is Loma not fighting Walters. Once Loma fights Walters the Rigo fight is still there.

            As for being a fan, I've been a fan a lot longer than you. As usual, when your argument gets destroyed you try and switch it.

            my 1st post in the other thread was about me being hypocritical. you then proceeded to say the same thing. for months you claimed I was protecting LSC from rigo, then switched to say I was protecting rigo from Loma.

            Basically, you needed someone to talk to online and I gave you that. Next time, just say thanks Dunn for keeping me from hurting myself or someone else.

            There was literally nothing for us to be arguing about.
            Like I said, you don't fool me. I know what you're about. It's evident from the quote in my sig that you're a very angry and disturbed old man with an agenda. This fake nice guy objective persona doesn't wash with me.

            Let's have it real, you're hedging your bets on Walters doing a job on Lomachenko at the higher weight because YOU are scared. Not Arum or Lomachenko. You are scared that a white Arum promoted fighter knocks off two top black fighters and becomes a star. The thought of that absolutely terrifies you!

            Which I always suspected was part of the reason you were so desperate for GGG to move up and fight Ward. Your blatant hypocrisy and double standards here just reinforces it.

            You masquerade around here as an objective fan of the sport but you're just a very insecure scared little man. Remember - you can fool some of the ***tards on here but I know you too well.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by PBP. View Post
              Rigo is shot. I have zero interest in this fight anymore.

              His best bet is to play it safe and get one last pay day.
              I want to see him fight 2 times a year before I say hes shot if he fights again in may and looks the same (not able to pull the trigger) then ill say hes past it n shot, hes definitely ageing but ring rust is real, plus he took the fight on short notice

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                Like I said, you don't fool me. I know what you're about. It's evident from the quote in my sig that you're a very angry and disturbed old man with an agenda. This fake nice guy objective persona doesn't wash with me.

                Let's have it real, you're hedging your bets on Walters doing a job on Lomachenko at the higher weight because YOU are scared. Not Arum or Lomachenko. You are scared that a white Arum promoted fighter knocks off two top black fighters and becomes a star. The thought of that absolutely terrifies you!

                Which I always suspected was part of the reason you were so desperate for GGG to move up and fight Ward. Your blatant hypocrisy and double standards here just reinforces it.

                You masquerade around here as an objective fan of the sport but you're just a very insecure scared little man. Remember - you can fool some of the ***tards on here but I know you too well.
                Turning to race when your argument gets destroyed. Then trying to frame me because you can't refute the points made. That's fine, that's what losers do.

                I always picked Walters to beat Loma when the fight was initially discussed @126. I welcome the fight. If Loma wins, he wins. If he loses, which I think he will, he can still become a star by rebuilding himself.

                So your point makes absolutely no sense. Just deflecting because you tried to switch the point of the discussion. Now you are implying I am happy the Walters/Loma fight isn't happening.

                Geez dude, make up your mind.
                Yesterday, I wanted it to protect rigo, now today you say I don't want it to protect Walters. Are you drunk?

                I notice you didn't answer the questions. You never once said anything about Loma v Rigo prior to it. you didn't care about a match between 2 gold medalists. Now you think beating Rigo is the path to stardom for Loma. LMFAO!!

                You can try to make this about me but the debate was and always will be centered around us not getting the Walters v Loma fight as planned. Loma/ Arum moved away from it, gave a BS reason why, made a face saving call out, and that backfired.

                My agenda is simple-earn being a star by fighting the best fights, even if you can't win them, then if you lose build yourself up in a match that you have a good chance of winning.
                Last edited by The Big Dunn; 11-24-2015, 10:00 AM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                  Turning to race when your argument gets destroyed. Then trying to frame me because you can't refute the points made. That's fine, that's what losers do.

                  I always picked Walters to beat Loma when the fight was initially discussed @126. I welcome the fight. If Loma wins, he wins. If he loses, which I think he will, he can still become a star by rebuilding himself. So your point makes absolutely no sense. Just deflecting because you tried to switch the point of the discussion.

                  I notice you didn't answer the questions. You never once said anything about Loma v Rigo prior to it. you didn't care about a match between 2 gold medalists. Now you think beating Rigo is the path to stardom for Loma. LMFAO!!

                  You can try to make this about me but the debate was and always will be centered around us not getting the Walters v Loma fight as planned. Loma/ Arum moved away from it, gave a BS reason why, made a face saving call out, and that backfired.

                  My agenda is simple-earn being a star by fighting the best fights, even if you can't win them, then if you lose build yourself up in a match that you have a good chance of winning.
                  My argument is that I want to see both fights. That's not an "argument", it's just a wish as fan of the sport.

                  Your reasoning for wanting to see one over the other is purely based around your insecurities.

                  Just like how GGG fans hedge their bets on Kovalev doing a job on Ward. You have put your eggs in the Walters basket.

                  Comment


                  • Arguing with dirk is a waste of time. He's always right guys, never wrong

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                      Geez dude, make up your mind.
                      Yesterday, I wanted it to protect rigo, now today you say I don't want it to protect Walters. Are you drunk?
                      No I quit drinking actually but I could see through your **** if I was tripping on acid.

                      You are less worried about protecting Walters because you actually think he can beat Lomachenko. You're hedging your bets on the bigger guy doing the job for the smaller one.

                      Same as GGG fans do with Kovalev.

                      It seeps through in your posts when you call the Salido fight an "ass-whupping" - you obviously took great joy in that even though Salido basically broke the rules.

                      And it's why you defend Walters for breaking the rules and coming in overweight. You don't trash him, you have the nerve to trash Lomachenko for not following him up in weight immediately despite the fact it was Walters who was too unprofessional to keep his end of the bargain.

                      Laughable!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP