Comments Thread For: Cotto Saw Golovkin's WBC Spot as Financially Motivated

[aboutfkntime]

thats his routine around here brother. That, or he just abandons the thread once you expose him as a clown.......

OnePunch.....

In your professional opinion, and considering your vast experience..... tell us all what you think a NON-PROFIT organisation needs 1.1mil for ?

And you can include that link I'm waiting for in your reply.

[OnePunch]

Tell me what a NON-PROFIT organisation needs 1.1mil for, you fkn asshats ?

They werent getting 1.1 million idiot, they were getting 300k......

[aboutfkntime]

They werent getting 1.1 million idiot, they were getting 300k......

What does a NON-PROFIT organisation need 300k for genius ?

[aboutfkntime]

I clearly said I don't support the WBC rules. I know you have difficulty comprehending things, but that was pretty clear. I corrected you in saying the WBC haven't broken any of their rules in installing Golovkin as mandatory, despite him being WBA champion. Your U-turn on it all suggests you've accepted that, and good..

I don't have to be a big Golovkin fan to call you out on your bias. I don't even like him as a fighter that much, but you're still a sad excuse for a human being with this level of dislike and bias against a man you know next to nothing about. You post and talk more about Golovkin than an actual Golovkin fan. That has to mean something..

The fact that you support a corrupt ABC organisation over a veteran fighter means something.

The latest generation of fans are the very worst.

[aboutfkntime]

The fact that you support a corrupt ABC organisation over a veteran fighter means something.

The latest generation of fans are the very worst.

Golovkin will unify before Klitschko, and he will break Hopkins record without facing a world-class opponent.

Just so long as you're all happy with that.

Have fun watching boxing.... ooops, I mean.... watching your girlfriend GGG.

The latest generation of fans are the very worst.

[OnePunch]

What does a NON-PROFIT organisation need 300k for genius ?

There is something wrong with you. Your brain does not function properly.

You might should see someone about that.

[techliam]

The fact that you support a corrupt ABC organisation over a veteran fighter means something.

The latest generation of fans are the very worst.

In theory, a boxer can break the rules and needs to be punished accordingly (the WBC should have stripped Mayweather at 154, WBA should have stripped Ward after not defending for 2 years), and ofc a corrupt organisation can also make correct decisions.

I support the WBC in attempting to enforce a mandatory fight, which reflects the divisions lineal champion vs the divisions best fighter. I think you should too, as to me that is the best vs the best. Cotto arranged a step aside agreement with Golovkin, and didn't follow up on it. 300k sanctioning fees is a lot, but 3% is fixed. Some of it will line corrupt pockets, some of it goes to retirement funds for boxers...the WBC have offered to disclose their accounts in their argument with the WBA, I support that. I don't see where the issue is really overall. I don't have blind hate and anger clouding my judgement on that one.

[aboutfkntime]

There is something wrong with you. Your brain does not function properly.

You might should see someone about that.

How's business ?

And how's that link coming along ?

[aboutfkntime]

In theory, a boxer can break the rules and needs to be punished accordingly (the WBC should have stripped Mayweather at 154, WBA should have stripped Ward after not defending for 2 years), and ofc a corrupt organisation can also make correct decisions.

I support the WBC in attempting to enforce a mandatory fight, which reflects the divisions lineal champion vs the divisions best fighter. I think you should too, as to me that is the best vs the best. Cotto arranged a step aside agreement with Golovkin, and didn't follow up on it. 300k sanctioning fees is a lot, but 3% is fixed. Some of it will line corrupt pockets, some of it goes to retirement funds for boxers...the WBC have offered to disclose their accounts in their argument with the WBA, I support that. I don't see where the issue is really overall. I don't have blind hate and anger clouding my judgement on that one.

You are a just shameless golovtard imo, I'll just leave it there.

I could never support corruption over fighters.

Boxing > Fighters > Vultures..... is how it should work.

You did not just support a corrupt ABC organisation who has previously been convicted of bribery and corruption over a fighter, you supported a corrupt ABC organisation who has previously been convicted of bribery and corruption over the sport of boxing.

[OnePunch]

How's business ?

And how's that link coming along ?

Business is good. No complaints. Thanks for asking

And if you think that I will spend even 10 seconds searching forum topics for the times you abandoned threads after you were proven to be an idiot, then that affirms my earlier proclamation that your brain does not function properly.