[POLL] Who Has Faced The Softest Competition Overall?

[j0zef]

How is it a "troll thread" to ask who has got the best resume between three undefeated fighters of around the same age, weight and ranking?

It's a troll thread because no decent Golovkin fan ever denied the strength of Ward's resume. No one.

Andre Ward won a Gold Medal at the Olympics, only Silver for GGG so if you're sad enough to go back to the amateurs.....you stay losing.

I thought your thread was about strength of competition? I think we can all agree that Ward walked through absolute nobodies on the way to his olympic gold, while Golovkin had to face some pretty damn decent fighters.

Also, even though I know you tend to dislike videos that show facts you don't like, check 8:20 - 9:30 in this video, they asked him about the results at the olympics.
https://********/J99vXbRE3xE?t=8m35s

And here's an old thread regarding the final that he lost in the olympics:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Boxing/comm...k_gaydarbekov/

[Dirk Diggler UK]

There's still a difference between being a star, who has the most career achievements, and who is the top P4P fighter among the 3.

Kovalev beats GGG in all departments if it were down to me.

GGG is just the guy that HBO have handpicked as their next star. His PPV numbers show that the public aren't convinced yet.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

It's a troll thread because no decent Golovkin fan ever denied the strength of Ward's resume. No one.


I thought your thread was about strength of competition? I think we can all agree that Ward walked through absolute nobodies on the way to his olympic gold, while Golovkin had to face some pretty damn decent fighters.

Also, even though I know you tend to dislike videos that show facts you don't like, check 8:20 - 9:30 in this video, they asked him about the results at the olympics.
https://********/J99vXbRE3xE?t=8m35s

My thread is about who has the better professional resume. It's a basic question.

[SplitSecond]

Outside of Kovalev's two best wins, then Golovkin has the better resume? LOL...ok then. Great logic. Outside of your **** and balls, you are a woman.

No, what I'm saying is it's close, because outside of those two wins Kovalev's resume is very weak and those two wins aren't that special. As a weird analogy, rocket fuel for example, Pascal and Hopkins as fuel sources may propel Kovalev's ship a good distance at once but the rest of the fuel is very low grade and the propulsion is very little, compared to Golovkin's fuel containing numerous decent grade fuel sources, they both travel about the same distance before running out of fuel.

And you talked about losses and bad performances etc affecting p4p standings. Kovalev has been KD'd I believe and has a draw on his resume.

[IMDAZED]

Lol I see we have a racist here.

OMG please don't call me that it hurts my feelings!

[j0zef]

My thread is about who has the better professional resume. It's a basic question.

Uhm, no. That's a nice deflection attempt where you once again disregard the content of what you're quoting (because it doesn't match with the fairy tale you tell yourself - seriously, are facts your kryptonite?).

But your original post stated:

All three of these men are ranked in the top 5 pound-for-pound by Ring Magazine and are very highly thought of but who has faced the weakest competition in their whole careers?

Notice I have used their entire careers to give a fairer reflection unlike some other polls which are going around where the feminine thread starters have used a select period of time and blocked people from the thread to slant opinion in their favour.

You're cherry picking again, just like you usually do.

[Johnwoo8686]

Since people seem to have forgotten the TS' original question, and the poll, GGG has faced the softest competition overall. I feel like the TS made this thread just to see Ward haters pick him and not GGG lol

Even if you're a GGG or Kovalev fan, you have to be embarrassed on the inside that you picked Ward.

LOL, Im not going to lie. When I clicked on Ward's name to see who would pick him I expected to see some of the names on there. Some guys can't let go of their bias no matter what.

[Trinidad_Fan]

It took him until his 43rd fight to finally step up.
I'm assuming we're talking over their career here.

the poll said overall not how deep into their careers before, but he was young as hell in defense to the 43rd fight. im not a big canelo fan but he has been in there with some good comp n doesn't belong in the poll

Not trying to be picky here... but the question says "softest competition overall", which to me means you have to take into consideration his entire pro career. People always bring up his age, but the fact of the matter is Canelo was fed a ridiculously soft lineup of opponents, all in Mexico, while creating a bloated record (a la JCC Jr.) which gave the illusion of a superstar in the making. Only when he fought Trout was he finally fighting someone who didn't have a size, age, quality, or other complete disadvantage. I've never been a fan of putting 40-50 tomato cans on your record before they put you in with someone with a pulse.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Uhm, no. That's a nice deflection attempt where you once again disregard the content of what you're quoting (because it doesn't match with the fairy tale you tell yourself - seriously, are facts your kryptonite?).

But your original post stated:


You're cherry picking again, just like you usually do.

I would assume I wouldn't have to explain that I meant their pro careers. I thought that would be obvious to functioning human beings.

[Raonic]

OMG please don't call me that it hurts my feelings!

Racist racist racist racist.

Don;'t get why you can't handle the fact that I'm talented and black.