Kell Brook: "I want Thurman. I want Bradley"

[imperial1]

I bet he ends up fighting Gurrero ..

[Box-Office]

Why ""? It would be a unification?

Reiterating the fact it would be a huge deal.

[LacedUp]

Reiterating the fact it would be a huge deal.

It would.

When Brook dispatches of him, are people going to give him his just dues?

With Porter, Chaves and Bradley as wins, his resume would outshine Khan's with ease.

[Disturbed]

Would love to see him against Bradley in the future - would be a good and interesting fight for sure

[Box-Office]

It would.

When Brook dispatches of him, are people going to give him his just dues?

With Porter, Chaves and Bradley as wins, his resume would outshine Khan's with ease.

Probably, he isn't called Amir Khan, so "our Kell" will get lotta credit.

You can scratch Chaves out of there. He walks in this fight as a non-champion who has never beaten a name. Even if he achieves something later it doesn't
"improve" Kell's wins cuz he walked in to this one as I described.

Being a puncher is not an accomplishment.

[LacedUp]

Probably, he isn't called Amir Khan, so "our Kell" will get lotta credit.

You can scratch Chaves out of there. He walks in this fight as a non-champion who has never beaten a name. Even if he achieves something later it doesn't
"improve" Kell's wins cuz he walked in to this one as I described.

Being a puncher is not an accomplishment.

lol who cares if he's a non champion? He is a good fighter.

As I said, Brook beating Chaves and then Bradley would make his resume better than Khan's. Khan still probably hasn't fought by the time it happens.

[Box-Office]

lol who cares if he's a non champion? He is a good fighter.

As I said, Brook beating Chaves and then Bradley would make his resume better than Khan's. Khan still probably hasn't fought by the time it happens.

You skipped beating a name part, convenient. Chaves may be good, but has he PROVEN it in the ring, yet? So, far we have: gave Thurman hell, Drew with Bradley and was winning before the Rios DQ and of course he can punch. Those are his alleged achievements.

Funny how you deflect by bringing in Khan, even Brook's fans can't help, but associate everything about Kell with Khan. Even the fact Chaves is a puncher is relevant cuz Alex/Algi weren't. LOL.

[LacedUp]

You skipped beating a name part, convenient. Chaves may be good, but has he PROVEN it in the ring, yet? So, far we have: gave Thurman hell, Drew with Bradley and was winning before the Rios DQ and of course he can punch. Those are his alleged achievements.

Funny how you deflect by bringing in Khan, even Brook's fans can't help, but associate everything about Kell with Khan. Even the fact Chaves is a puncher is relevant cuz Alex/Algi weren't. LOL.

Yes he has proven he's a good fighter. I mean, as much as I care about your opinion, I care slightly more about the multi division world champion, Tim Bradley who's shared the ring with him for 12 rounds.

Unlike you he doesn't go around: "Chaves isa bum yo, he got no wins"

https://<iframe width="854" height="...reen></iframe>

What is Luis Collazo's claim to fame? Beating Jose Rivera for a WBA title no one cared about and giving good guys problems. difference between him and Chaves is that Chaves didn't do that 10 years ago he did it last year. Yet people like you were still saying Collazo was a good fight. I guess no double standards there.

It's very relevant because Khan knows he can beat people who can't punch. That's the reason why he's not fighting punchers. Ever. He's learnt his lesson. Quite smart actually.

[Box-Office]

Yes he has proven he's a good fighter. I mean, as much as I care about your opinion, I care slightly more about the multi division world champion, Tim Bradley who's shared the ring with him for 12 rounds.

Unlike you he doesn't go around: "Chaves isa bum yo, he got no wins"

What is Luis Collazo's claim to fame? Beating Jose Rivera for a WBA title no one cared about and giving good guys problems. difference between him and Chaves is that Chaves didn't do that 10 years ago he did it last year. Yet people like you were still saying Collazo was a good fight. I guess no double standards there.

It's very relevant because Khan knows he can beat people who can't punch. That's the reason why he's not fighting punchers. Ever. He's learnt his lesson. Quite smart actually.

Was Bradley gonna say he Drew with a mediocre fighter let alone a bum? Not that Chaves is a bum, but you get the point.

You see in the real world we go by facts, facts are Chaves has never beaten a name nor ever win a World title, 0-2-1 in his real fights. Not by what the guys who beat Chaves thought of him. Stop clutching on straws.

You sound like those Khan fans who big up how Amir was battering Garcia before he got clipped as if that means anything cuz the end result was Khan lost.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Was Bradley gonna say he Drew with a mediocre fighter let alone a bum? Not that Chaves is a bum, but you get the point.

You see in the real world we go by facts, facts are Chaves has never beaten a name nor ever win a World title, 0-2-1 in his real fights. Stop clutching on straws.

But Bradley thought he won the fight. He didn't think it was a draw so why would he feel the need to praise Chaves? Why would Thurman when he stopped him? Why would Rios?

I think you're the one clutching AT straws.

We all know that you'd be reciting the alphabet with your tongue around Chaves' ringpiece if he was Khan's next opponent.

Like the cringeworthy "Damn guys Chris Algieri is a hellava fighter" thread you made as soon as Khan cherry picked him over Brook.