Crawford or Khan? Who deserves the Pacquiao fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Box-Office
    Russo Guy
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2013
    • 7620
    • 245
    • 483
    • 14,068

    #21
    Funny, how the whole "he has never fought at WW" argument applied to Khan, but not Crawford.


    I for one have been "meh" about Khan vs Pac, although it'd be nice if Khan does get it, I've always preferred DSG rematch over Pac. So, based on that I'd say Crawford, not cuz I believe he deserves it more, but cuz I prefer other fights for King Khan.

    Also it always made sense to sacrifice Pacquiao to Crawford and use it as a springboard in order for them to launch their next superstar. Just keep that boy away from Postol.
    Last edited by Box-Office; 10-25-2015, 12:06 AM.

    Comment

    • Box-Office
      Russo Guy
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2013
      • 7620
      • 245
      • 483
      • 14,068

      #22
      Originally posted by LacedUp
      Kell Brook deserves it more than both.

      But out of the two mentioned i say Crawford has looked best.
      He has no fights at WW doe.

      Comment

      • b00g13man
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2012
        • 12197
        • 265
        • 51
        • 34,905

        #23
        Not Khan...

        Comment

        • FlatLine
          Lights out.
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2012
          • 5740
          • 318
          • 117
          • 36,496

          #24
          Khan and it's not even debatable. Crawford isn't even a 147 pounder and he has a virtually non-existent resume. He needs to build up his resume over a couple of years before he even deserves to be mentioned in the same sentence as Khan or Pacquiao.

          Comment

          • Left Hook Tua
            VATNIK
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 62306
            • 7,010
            • 1,581
            • 951,318

            #25
            Originally posted by FlatLine
            Khan and it's not even debatable. Crawford isn't even a 147 pounder and he has a virtually non-existent resume. He needs to build up his resume over a couple of years before he even deserves to be mentioned in the same sentence as Khan or Pacquiao.
            2014 Fighter of the Year

            how many of those khan won?

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #26
              Originally posted by Box-Office
              He has no fights at WW doe.
              And why would the fight be at WW?

              Comment

              • boliodogs
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2008
                • 33358
                • 824
                • 1,782
                • 309,589

                #27
                Crawford and it's not even close. Khan just sits on his ass and doesn't fight anybody. He just brags and expects Mayweather and Pacquiao fights to be handed to him on a silver platter. Crawford fights. Crawford is an undefeated champion and a top 10 pound for pound guy. Khan is a big talking want to be who isn't on anybody's top ten pound for pound list and hasn't been a world champion for 3 years. If Khan had defeated a Thurman or a Porter or a Garcia then I would say he deserved the Pacquiao fight ahead of Crawford. But he doesn't deserve anything for sitting the year out after barely beating Algieri who was slaughtered by Pacquiao.

                Comment

                • Left Hook Tua
                  VATNIK
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 62306
                  • 7,010
                  • 1,581
                  • 951,318

                  #28
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  And why would the fight be at WW?
                  it don't matter 140-147.

                  tcraw was 156 lbs. in the ring tonight. he's bigger than pac.

                  if i was arum i'd throw tcraw in with rios/bradley winner 1st. get tcraw an easy 147 belt.

                  Comment

                  • Jc8804
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 6231
                    • 394
                    • 143
                    • 30,652

                    #29
                    TC is all wrong for pac

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 49972
                      • 5,127
                      • 270
                      • 104,043

                      #30
                      Crawford because he atleast has some tools and a style that could pose Pacquaio some problems.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP