Originally posted by MC Hammer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Al Haymon/Investors Get Upper Hand in Top Rank Lawsuit
Collapse
-
Last edited by Cinci Champ; 10-19-2015, 12:41 PM.
-
Originally posted by MC Hammer View PostBoth mentioned the Ali Act. Plus a violation of the act has nothing to do with GB;Thats between the fighter and promoter. GB has no grounds to get any money based on that. Face it my friend, GB and TR lose here.
BTW- GBP lawsuit must have some legs if the judge denied motion for it to go to arbitration and instead be played out in court.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostI can care less. Just stating what I've read.
BTW- GBP lawsuit must have some legs if the judge denied motion for it to go to arbitration and instead be played out in court.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SchoolTheseCats View PostWas denied to go to the arbitration judge because it wasn't tied into settlement haymon and gb agreed to is why
solution: just compete and stay consistent
Comment
-
Originally posted by about.thousands View PostNumber 1. The Ali Act is to protect fighters against promoters not promoters against boxing networks. If that were the case HBO would be sued all the time for violating the Ali Act.
Number 2. DiBella co-wrote the Ali Act. Do you think he'd work with someone violating it and leave himself exposed?
Number 3. A boxer calling Haymon his promoter means nothing. That's just like black ppl calling our close friends our cousin. It's not what they say it's how it's structured legally. Every single show has had a promoter not named Haymon.
Number 4. If GBP & TR are relying on screenshots their cases are shot. Every cent Haymon pays out is accounted for. If you're operating illegally you don't write a check. Haymon takes his advisor fee off top then he pays Chavez. How can TR or GBP prove that's not true?
The fact of the matter is that neither GBP or TR have any idea how PBC is structured so they're throwing anything hoping it sticks. They're banking on the judge to give them discovery evidence but before that phase they have to prove they're being damaged. So it's basically "PBC is damaging us but we aren't sure how they're doing it but judge we'd like you to show us Haymon's books so we can prove he's damaging us."
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostCan't wait to hear the excuses after the GBP lawsuit doesn't dent the PBC train.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostI can care less. Just stating what I've read. If I want to see court battles I'll watch judge judy. Whomever wins/loses a court case has zero effect on my life or me as a fan of the sport.
BTW- GBP lawsuit must have some legs if the judge denied motion for it to go to arbitration and instead be played out in court.
Comment
-
Originally posted by about.thousands View PostNumber 1. The Ali Act is to protect fighters against promoters not promoters against boxing networks. If that were the case HBO would be sued all the time for violating the Ali Act.
Number 2. DiBella co-wrote the Ali Act. Do you think he'd work with someone violating it and leave himself exposed?
Number 3. A boxer calling Haymon his promoter means nothing. That's just like black ppl calling our close friends our cousin. It's not what they say it's how it's structured legally. Every single show has had a promoter not named Haymon.
Number 4. If GBP & TR are relying on screenshots their cases are shot. Every cent Haymon pays out is accounted for. If you're operating illegally you don't write a check. Haymon takes his advisor fee off top then he pays Chavez. How can TR or GBP prove that's not true?
The fact of the matter is that neither GBP or TR have any idea how PBC is structured so they're throwing anything hoping it sticks. They're banking on the judge to give them discovery evidence but before that phase they have to prove they're being damaged. So it's basically "PBC is damaging us but we aren't sure how they're doing it but judge we'd like you to show us Haymon's books so we can prove he's damaging us."
What Dibella says is irrelevant he is working for Haymon he has to defend him what the hell else would he say. Plus he's not even mentioned in any of these lawsuits and can always play ignorance. Again it's Haymon who is accused of breaking the law not Dibella.
Of course if multiple boxers of his are referring and calling him a promoter which is illegal is a big deal because he's denying that's what he is. Well if everyone in the industry knows it and even his own fighters are telling you this you don't think that gives the courts reason to force him to open up his books and explain his actual role? Golden Boy is saying the promoters name you see on his shows is a sham and that he is really the one promoting it and handling the promoter duties.
The screen shot of a fighters check is not the only evidence Golden Boy has and more will clearly come out in court. But many lawsuits have been created and won because of things people post on twitter. The point of the check is this man says he is not a promoter yet his fighters call him a promoter and he is writing purse checks to his fighters like a promoter. Whether you agree with the Ali Act or not the point is he is clearly violating it and is not just a fighters manager and Golden Boy worked with him closely and have insider knowledge of how he works and I'm sure will the lawsuit will lead to them requesting that he make specific documents public. But again which is it are you denying he is also a promoter or is your argument he should be allowed to be both because you keep flip flopping between the two?
Comment
Comment