So what do you make of Berto? And what about his opponents that couldn't put him away. I recall there was a guy claiming to be tbe that couldn't hurt a mediocre like Berto, but a has been like Soto Karass did. Your method of judging fighters is very fuzzy. Of course the MW has its hits and miss, but to say that it is garbage is overblowing it.
when Was the Last Big Hype Middleweight Fight?
Collapse
-
So who in boxing does it for you now???Lol, you are so dumb. That sarcasm does not even make any sense. GGG's resume sucks, Lemiuex sucks even worse.
It would make sense if DL was some kind of great fighter with a great resume, then that would have justified your sarcasm. You are clearly just acting like a dumbass, or like I said, your comprehension level is very low.Comment
-
is bailey a top fighter and champ at 160? sorry my brain doesn't understand straw mans. try making good points. the funny thing is ggg is such a big favorite because of people like you who hype ggg up and say he's so great. if according to you he has a bad resume and is unproven the odds should be a lot closer right? unproven guy vs terrible fighter who will win? no one knows.You talk about power punchers like that matters. Might as well have Golovkin vs Bailey next, I mean it's two big power punchers going at it. No one knows who is going to win, right?
Lemiuex is a champion in his weight class because it is such a poor division, that is the only difference between him and Berto. Berto wouldn't be able to make a comeback at WW, it's too stacked. MW is a graveyard. You got Quillin needing help against Rosado. You got Mora dropping Jacobs. You got Rubio stopping Lemiuex. To put in to perspective, Rubio was a comeback fight for a rehabed Pavlik, and Pavlik made him cry in his corner, literally. MW is trash. Golovkin fans are like religious creeps, you want peope to give him too much credit. Saying he is th only good MW is not enough, clearly you want me to suck him off like you do and say that he is in such a great division and Lee, Saunders, Lemiuex, N'Dam are all beasts and future Hall of Famers.
you can do that to any division. porter has a draw with julio diaz. porter's brooks only good win. pac is old and shot. bradley couldn't beat pac, provo, or chaves. thurman struggled with a ten years removed from his prime collazo. berto couldn't become champ because he was on the slide. lemieux became champ because he was on the rise, not because the division is trash. your logic makes no sense. he lost to rubio 4 years ago therefore he can't be good now?
you are the one giving him too much credit by saying he destroys everyone in his division. you are the one that has to nitpick and point out every loss a fighter in his division has. you are the one that nitpicks and points out how a guy that beat lemieux lost to pavlik like ten years ago. that's some good hating don't get me wrong but is it relevant to what's happening now? no. you are the double standard master. if someone is unproven you say they have'tn fought anyone but when some guys in the division have taken losses the division is sh-it! you can't have it both ways.Comment
-
What are you even asking? Boxing in general or vs Golovkin? I don't get it. Because I don't think MW is a good division, you are asking me who does it for me right now. That's the thing with Golovkin fans, they are hype beats, they are overdramatic.
Because I don't think Lemieux is good...so who is then? Like saying, you don't like a fighter so great like Lemiuex, then who do you like? Lol, ****ing twilight zone.Comment
-
he prob thinks 168 is super hot with arthur abraham as number 1.So what do you make of Berto? And what about his opponents that couldn't put him away. I recall there was a guy claiming to be tbe that couldn't hurt a mediocre like Berto, but a has been like Soto Karass did. Your method of judging fighters is very fuzzy. Of course the MW has its hits and miss, but to say that it is garbage is overblowing it.Comment
-
I really don't think it's going to be a shoot out. I see both fighters being cautious and GGG outboxing and outmaneuvering Lemieux at first. The French-Canadien backpedals due to GGG's great footwork. Lemieux's demise will come when he gets outjabbed/outboxed and throws caution to the wind. Knowing his only chance is to swarm and catch GGG in the exchange, Lemieux will get countered BAD! Another "good boy".
Comment
-
You're buying Gollovkin vs Tureano Johnson too? You'll probably be like, yo Johnson is good, he came back from a TKO and he can punch. We just want to see good punchers fight eachother but you clearly don't, all you wanna do is watch fights like Wladimir Klitschko vs Calzaghe.is bailey a top fighter and champ at 160? sorry my brain doesn't understand straw mans. try making good points. the funny thing is ggg is such a big favorite because of people like you who hype ggg up and say he's so great. if according to you he has a bad resume and is unproven the odds should be a lot closer right? unproven guy vs terrible fighter who will win? no one knows.
you can do that to any division. porter has a draw with julio diaz. porter's brooks only good win. pac is old and shot. bradley couldn't beat pac, provo, or chaves. thurman struggled with a ten years removed from his prime collazo. berto couldn't become champ because he was on the slide. lemieux became champ because he was on the rise, not because the division is trash. your logic makes no sense. he lost to rubio 4 years ago therefore he can't be good now?
you are the one giving him too much credit by saying he destroys everyone in his division. you are the one that has to nitpick and point out every loss a fighter in his division has. you are the one that nitpicks and points out how a guy that beat lemieux lost to pavlik like ten years ago. that's some good hating don't get me wrong but is it relevant to what's happening now? no. you are the double standard master. if someone is unproven you say they have'tn fought anyone but when some guys in the division have taken losses the division is sh-it! you can't have it both ways.Comment
-
Comment
-
No, if you're saying all these fighters are garbage then why are you even following boxing? Why are you here? Basically, there's no need to follow boxing if you put them down this much and you think there are not worth you're time. So which fighters excite you??? Go...What are you even asking? Boxing in general or vs Golovkin? I don't get it. Because I don't think MW is a good division, you are asking me who does it for me right now. That's the thing with Golovkin fans, they are hype beats, they are overdramatic.
Because I don't think Lemieux is good...so who is then? Like saying, you don't like a fighter so great like Lemiuex, then who do you like? Lol, ****ing twilight zone.Comment
-
A-****ing-gain.
Wtf are you asking? Because I don't think MW is a good division, I don't like boxing? Jesus F*ing Christ.
Middleweight=Boxing.
Yeah, **** middleweight, and? I don't give a **** about MW. I have been watching boxing since the 90s, and I don't give a **** about the current MW division. Do you have an issue with that? MW is not Boxing, there's 17 weight classes.Comment
Comment