Originally posted by SplitSecond
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should Ineffective Aggression Be Regarded As A Major Scoring Criteria?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by AllEyesOpen View PostThe answer to the question is no, it should not.
But I disagree with the ts assuming that it does not already happen, fact is to many judges already give credit for ineffective aggression. IMHO a lot of the times you see a scorecard that doesn't match reality or the other scorecards it's usually because they felt one fighter deserved the credit as the aggressor regardless of how ineffective it was.
Effective Aggression is in the eye of the beholder.
And lol at officially scoring "ineffective" aggression. By these rules, I reckon you scored it as "ineffective aggression" in favor of Fury and Klit when they punched their own face?
Comment
-
Originally posted by sicko View PostAre some fans getting that desperate that they want to change rules to give their overrated favorite fighter an advantage over fighters that fans know their favorite fighter can't beat
Landing Clean is how your score points. You don't get points for swigging at Air and at someones GuardOriginally posted by therealpugilist View Post^^^^^^^
Comment
-
-
No but there definitely needs to be better balanced judging between aggressor and defenser.
Because ineffective aggression is more visible than ineffective defense.
I dont think Floyd did well against manny because mannys defense matched floyds or even outperformed and he was also better aggressor.
But most people couldnt see that floyds defense game wasnt working out,
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostThat line reminded me of this. Floyd swinging at air and punch stats saying "close enough":
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vilicious86 View PostWell, damn. Good catch. But don't act like Floyd didn't land anything else all night.
Comment
Comment