Should Ineffective Aggression Be Regarded As A Major Scoring Criteria?
Collapse
-
-
Completely agree.The answer to the question is no, it should not.
But I disagree with the ts assuming that it does not already happen, fact is to many judges already give credit for ineffective aggression. IMHO a lot of the times you see a scorecard that doesn't match reality or the other scorecards it's usually because they felt one fighter deserved the credit as the aggressor regardless of how ineffective it was.
Effective Aggression is in the eye of the beholder.
And lol at officially scoring "ineffective" aggression. By these rules, I reckon you scored it as "ineffective aggression" in favor of Fury and Klit when they punched their own face?
Comment
-
That line reminded me of this. Floyd swinging at air and punch stats saying "close enough":Are some fans getting that desperate that they want to change rules to give their overrated favorite fighter an advantage over fighters that fans know their favorite fighter can't beat
Landing Clean is how your score points. You don't get points for swigging at Air and at someones Guard
Comment
-
Comment
-
No but there definitely needs to be better balanced judging between aggressor and defenser.
Because ineffective aggression is more visible than ineffective defense.
I dont think Floyd did well against manny because mannys defense matched floyds or even outperformed and he was also better aggressor.
But most people couldnt see that floyds defense game wasnt working out,Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Floyd landed at times but some rounds went the way that punch stat count went. Incorrectly scored. Floyd takes advantage of everything, as one should get by now and the Vegas judges are no different.Comment

Comment