Comments Thread For: Khan: Chaves Not a Top Guy, Brook Needs To Do Better

[John Locke]

At the end of the day you people are going by ifs, buts, would've, should've and could've. Fact of the matter is Chaves is going in to this fight as someone who has always fallen short when it counted.

What do you mean 'you people'? What people are you referring to?

He didn't fall short against Rios, as he was clearly winning the fight with 1 round to go, even with two wrong point deductions. If a referee wrongfully DQs a fighter, it doesn't mean they fell short. It's the ref's mistake.

Maidana has fallen short against every C+ fighter he's fought, what do you think of him? His best win is against an overrated C+ Broner who isn't even a welterweight.

[Zaroku]

Amir Khan thinks very little of Kell Brook's upcoming defense of the IBF welterweight title against Diego Chaves. The fight is scheduled for October 24th in Sheffield.

Khan (31-3, 19KOs) vs. Brook (35-0, 24KOs) is one of the biggest fights to be made in the UK.

Brook would like to face Khan by the midway point of next year. Khan says it's possible, if Brook steps up his level of competition.
[Click Here To Read More]

Khan, either of those guys will chin check that sugar candy glass your chin is made from.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Why would Bradley say he had a tough time against a bum?

Not that he is a bum, but even then.

Chaves is solid, he may even pull an upset, but he goes in this fight as someone who came up short in all 3 of his step ups. May be he'll win a title or beat a name later on, but that would be irrelevant to this event. Johnny Nelson's early beaters can't claim they beat a World level fighter cuz Nelson went in to those fights as a journeyman.


-Gave Thurman a tough time before getting stopped.

-Drew with Bradley

-Was winning against Rios before the DQ.


Cringe.

Jesus, you really are a freak. You try to post like me so badly. It's ***in creepy. You need to go back to being who you are and stop trying so hard to be funny (me).

Why would Bradley and/or Thurman for that matter lie? Is it a coincidence that these top fighters are all saying that Chaves is a tough fight?

Amir Khan has 3 losses on his record that weren't even step ups and got blasted out in 2 of them. One by a journey man.

Now that's cringe.

[M Bison]

Jesus, you really are a freak. You try to post like me so badly. It's ***in creepy. You need to go back to being who you are and stop trying so hard to be funny (me).

Why would Bradley and/or Thurman for that matter lie? Is it a coincidence that these top fighters are all saying that Chaves is a tough fight?

Amir Khan has 3 losses on his record that weren't even step ups and got blasted out in 2 of them. One by a journey man.

Now that's cringe.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

What do you mean 'you people'? What people are you referring to?

He didn't fall short against Rios, as he was clearly winning the fight with 1 round to go, even with two wrong point deductions. If a referee wrongfully DQs a fighter, it doesn't mean they fell short. It's the ref's mistake.

Maidana has fallen short against every C+ fighter he's fought, what do you think of him? His best win is against an overrated C+ Broner who isn't even a welterweight.

Marcos Maidana's best win before he fought Khan was Vicky Ortiz

Khantards say that legitimised him

[Box-Office]

Jesus, you really are a freak. You try to post like me so badly. It's ***in creepy. You need to go back to being who you are and stop trying so hard to be funny (me).

Why would Bradley and/or Thurman for that matter lie? Is it a coincidence that these top fighters are all saying that Chaves is a tough fight?

Amir Khan has 3 losses on his record that weren't even step ups and got blasted out in 2 of them. One by a journey man.

Now that's cringe.

Just look at your sign, look at how you try to leech off my jokes. It is a fact that my signs and avis are well received on this forum. You try to play it off as parody, but you can't come up with any of your own. You're so lame that you go back and delete posts, so I can't re-post them, freaking beta.

Thurman is a top fighter? The best win on his record before Chaves was Quintana or Zavcek.

He is tough, if he was managed properly he'd may even be a champ, but he is going in this one as someone who lost when it counted.

What does Khan's losses gotta do with this? You're such a low life with your petty deflections.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Just look at your sign, look at how you try to leech off my jokes. It is a fact that my signs and avis are well received on this forum. You try to play it off as parody, but you can't come up with any of your own.

It is parody. You try to be funny. No one laughs. I parody them and top them. Everyone laughs and you die a little more inside.

A little different than you literally mimicking my posting style because you're trying too hard to be funny when it's just not in your nature.

You're so lame that you go back and delete posts, so I can't re-post them, freaking beta.

I haven't deleted any posts. I think you're literally going mental right now.

Thurman is a top fighter? The best win on his record before Chaves was Quintana or Zavcek.

He is tough, if he was managed properly he'd may even be a champ, but he is going in this one as someone who lost when it counted.

Lost when it counted?

So did Marcos Maidana when he fought Khan. Never a champion, lost when it counted to Kotelnik. Best win is still Broner.

What about Zab Judah? He lost every big fight he was in and was well past his best when Khan fought him.

Lamont Peterson failed every time he stepped up before he fought Khan. Loss to Bradley, draw with Ortiz.

Kotelnik's had no notable wins when Khan fought him. A loss and a draw to Suleymane Mbaye and a loss to Junior Witter. Lost every time it counted.

Paulie Malignaggi lost every time he stepped up.

Devon Alexander has lost virtually every time he's stepped up.

*** me....Khan's resume is god awful going by your logic

Full of Lovemore N'Dou type opponents who lose when it really matters. Ouch.

[VG_Addict]

So did Marcos Maidana when he fought Khan. Never a champion, lost when it counted to Kotelnik. Best win is still Broner.

What about Zab Judah? He lost every big fight he was in and was well past his best when Khan fought him.

Lamont Peterson failed every time he stepped up before he fought Khan. Loss to Bradley, draw with Ortiz.

Kotelnik's had no notable wins when Khan fought him. A loss and a draw to Suleymane Mbaye and a loss to Junior Witter. Lost every time it counted.

Paulie Malignaggi lost every time he stepped up.

Devon Alexander has lost virtually every time he's stepped up.

*** me....Khan's resume is god awful going by your logic

Full of Lovemore N'Dou type opponents who lose when it really matters. Ouch.

Pretty much my thoughts. Khan's best wins are against guys who lost every time they stepped up.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Pretty much my thoughts. Khan's best wins are against guys who lost every time they stepped up.

Box-Office mugs himself off without even knowing it

Poor kid has lost his damn mind.

[LacedUp]

All you Kell-end cry about it is "puncher this and puncher that". Even the fact you people big up Chaves as a puncher is cuz Algieri and Alexander weren't punchers, so again you associate your idol's opposition with Khan in order to develop a selling point.

You continue to hide behind rankings though, the same ones who have Brook ranked top 10 p4p, sad.

Well we know Khan isn't looking at the top 10 rankings when he picks a fight that's for sure