Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Merchant Gives His Take on Mayweather IV Scandal

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
    But as you pointed out, NSAC felt that the situation did not require investigation.....

    Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever.

    They must have made at least preliminary enquiries with USADA to come to that conclusion.

    Both agencies feel that they are in a position to state that they are aware of all of the facts, and that no investigation is necessary.

    But USADA did investigate, NSAC most likely relies on their judgement.
    Contradicting yourself.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
      All of them had failed urine samples.
      This won't ever be resolved. It is less funny little by little.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by justicia liga View Post
        You do know the commission did not investigate so how can you say the commission knows what actually happened?

        If the commission did not investigate, did the commission do its job?
        Because they cleared them , that action speaks volumes while what you say means nothing .

        Think about it .

        Comment


        • Originally posted by justicia liga View Post
          Contradicting yourself.
          USADA investigated, NSAC did not, according to your post.

          They stated why..... " Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong ".

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            You are probably right..... but you can kill a pig with a steakknife if you try hard enough, that doesn't make it the best tool for the job.

            Mayweathers issue with Pacquiao was him avoiding random blood tests.

            Pacquiao would have undertaken the normal commission testing, but that wasn't good enough for Mayweather.

            Mayweather was right, so he should have been blood-tested as well, especially under circumstances that require an IV or a TUE.

            Just my humble opinion.

            FACT: there nothing wrong or harmful about a lil ol blood test.

            I'm not saying that Mayweather did anything wrong, just that blood testing beats urine testing.
            It's not a matter of being right, I'm not arguing. It's just a reported fact that they all had failed URINE samples. You can do the research and you'll find this out too.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Reloaded View Post

              Did you hear the story about Manny and his Toradol use since 2009 , have a read it really looks like Manny was up to no good and it explains why he refused blood testing until now .

              Hey Rath you ever seen a blood drug test result from Manny between 2009 and now , me neither they dont exist isnt that odd .
              Because NSAC, WADA, USADA allows Toradol use, that action speaks volumes while what you say means nothing.

              Think about it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by justicia liga View Post
                Because NSAC, WADA, USADA allows Toradol use, that action speaks volumes while what you say means nothing.

                Think about it.
                I think you missed the posts from there till now , its been stated done and dusted this is not pole vault , you should follow the convo in turn .

                Comment


                • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post

                  Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong ".
                  Declaration without investigation.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by justicia liga View Post
                    Because NSAC, WADA, USADA allows Toradol use, that action speaks volumes while what you say means nothing.

                    Think about it.
                    STOP !

                    Back the truck up.

                    Look what happens when I change the word Toradol, to Mayweather, in your post.....

                    Originally posted by justicia liga View Post
                    Because NSAC, WADA, USADA cleared Mayweather of wrongdoing, that action speaks volumes while what you say means nothing.

                    Think about it.
                    So USADA/NSAC are a relevant enough authority to comment on Toradol, but not on Mayweather?

                    Dude, your post above is correct imho, but you used USADA/NSAC authority to justify Toradol use, but not a TUE ?

                    If USADA are credible enough to use as justification for Toradol, then they are credible enough to comment on Mayweathers TUE.

                    Comment


                    • Larry Merchant has forgotten more about boxing than most of you guys dissing him will ever know. He was right on the money about Mayweather I agree with the poster that said " Larry did kick Mayweather's ass didn't need to be 50 yrs younger" ROFL
                      I was ridiculed myself years ago when I posted about the corruption in Vegas concerning Mayweather but todays events have proved my su****ions were probably spot on
                      Mayweather's career is a FRAUD! & FAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP