Who's undefeated record is more impressive Mayweather or Ottke

[El-blanco]

Shouldn't Ottke win the poll? Because he'd likely beat Floyd if they fought.

It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.

[The Big Dunn]

No dude. Just no.

I bet everyone that voted for Ottke in this poll also thinks Castillo beat Floyd in that fight.

As for those that think Bradley beat Manny in that fight-they are crazy for different reasons.

[El-blanco]

I bet everyone that voted for Ottke in this poll also thinks Castillo beat Floyd in that fight.

As for those that think Bradley beat Manny in that fight-they are crazy for different reasons.

I don't think anyone seriously voted for ottke.

[The Big Dunn]

It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.

if its about who accomplished more-one guys undefeated record makes him a 1st ballot HOF and one of the ATG's. The other guys resume makes him sven ottke.

[The Big Dunn]

I don't think anyone seriously voted for ottke.

Just like no one in Iowa would seriously vote for Deez nuts for president in the very real, very important, straw poll-then you realize 12% of Iowan **********s did just that.

[BrometheusBob.]

Shouldn't Ottke win the poll? Because he'd likely beat Floyd if they fought.

[IronDanHamza]

It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.

Well, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what the Maricano-Mayweather thread was about? And you started saying that you can't rank Mayweather ahead because he'd lose if they fought.

So what are you saying now that that isn't how you rank fighters?

"It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career" Precisely, which is exactly what you were dismissing in the other thread.

So what is it? Is it who wins if they fought or accomplishment based? How do you actually rank fighters because I honestly don't know You sound beyond confused.

[jas]

the majority opinion is usually the correct one

[Farrod]

Man, ya'll are crackin' me up!!

[b00g13man]

I voted Ottke