Who's undefeated record is more impressive Mayweather or Ottke

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • El-blanco
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2014
    • 12647
    • 616
    • 2,141
    • 23,841

    #61
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    Shouldn't Ottke win the poll? Because he'd likely beat Floyd if they fought.
    It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 69264
      • 9,488
      • 7,834
      • 287,568

      #62
      Originally posted by Beercules
      No dude. Just no.
      I bet everyone that voted for Ottke in this poll also thinks Castillo beat Floyd in that fight.

      As for those that think Bradley beat Manny in that fight-they are crazy for different reasons.

      Comment

      • El-blanco
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2014
        • 12647
        • 616
        • 2,141
        • 23,841

        #63
        Originally posted by The Big Dunn
        I bet everyone that voted for Ottke in this poll also thinks Castillo beat Floyd in that fight.

        As for those that think Bradley beat Manny in that fight-they are crazy for different reasons.
        I don't think anyone seriously voted for ottke.

        Comment

        • The Big Dunn
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 69264
          • 9,488
          • 7,834
          • 287,568

          #64
          Originally posted by El-blanco
          It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.
          if its about who accomplished more-one guys undefeated record makes him a 1st ballot HOF and one of the ATG's. The other guys resume makes him sven ottke.

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 69264
            • 9,488
            • 7,834
            • 287,568

            #65
            Originally posted by El-blanco
            I don't think anyone seriously voted for ottke.
            Just like no one in Iowa would seriously vote for Deez nuts for president in the very real, very important, straw poll-then you realize 12% of Iowan **********s did just that.

            Comment

            • BrometheusBob.
              All Time Great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2015
              • 20457
              • 915
              • 1,915
              • 156,555

              #66
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza
              Shouldn't Ottke win the poll? Because he'd likely beat Floyd if they fought.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 48371
                • 4,778
                • 266
                • 104,043

                #67
                Originally posted by El-blanco
                It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.
                Well, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what the Maricano-Mayweather thread was about? And you started saying that you can't rank Mayweather ahead because he'd lose if they fought.

                So what are you saying now that that isn't how you rank fighters?

                "It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career" Precisely, which is exactly what you were dismissing in the other thread.

                So what is it? Is it who wins if they fought or accomplishment based? How do you actually rank fighters because I honestly don't know You sound beyond confused.

                Comment

                • jas
                  Voice of Reason
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 22497
                  • 932
                  • 907
                  • 1,059,614

                  #68
                  the majority opinion is usually the correct one

                  Comment

                  • Farrod
                    Contender
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 134
                    • 12
                    • 0
                    • 6,195

                    #69
                    Man, ya'll are crackin' me up!!

                    Comment

                    • b00g13man
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 12197
                      • 265
                      • 51
                      • 34,905

                      #70
                      I voted Ottke

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP