It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.
Who's undefeated record is more impressive Mayweather or Ottke
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career, and in their division, not who'd win in the ring. I can't believe how dense you are that you still don't understand that. I'm done talking to 50 year old man who worships Floyd mayweather and considers p4p logical or scientific.
So what are you saying now that that isn't how you rank fighters?
"It's a discussion about who accomplished more in their career" Precisely, which is exactly what you were dismissing in the other thread.
So what is it? Is it who wins if they fought or accomplishment based? How do you actually rank fighters because I honestly don't knowYou sound beyond confused.
Comment
Comment