Comments Thread For: USADA Fires Back at Hauser Over Multiple Allegations

[soul_survivor]

ya right hauser wrote it as tho they caught mayweather with the iv in his arm and thats the only reason they knew then they granted a tue to save him. that was the whole agenda instead the reality is way different and they tested him before and after to make sure he wasnt using it to dope

What do you mean? It's the mere fact that he used an IV without any medical emergency or alternative methods that could have helped him which is illegal. It doesn't matter if he was pumping steroids into himself or ketchup, the use of the IV is illegal.

I think you will also find that NSAC originally reported to not having been informed of the use of the IV until weeks later, I haven't seen their latest statement and maybe they have changed what they said, to possibly save face. I don't know.

But with all the other stuff involving Mayweather, USADA, boxing, American sportsmen, the involvement of individuals who work with athletes to cover up PED use and so on, I wouldn't be surprised if he was using.

The saying goes, "If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't true". Lance Armstrong was a cancer survivor who would go on to win more championships post cancer than pre. People applauded him for his hardwork, dedication and immense physical gifts...we all now know where those gifts came from.

[ganthet]

Manny hasn't sued Paulie so does that mean Manny is a PED user?

Nope, it simply means that Paulie has no reputation nor credibility to begin with so suing him is pointless. The simple fact that you even asked that just goes to show how dumb your IQ works. Even everyone here knows that Paulie is a ******.

[Rath]

ok, that's what I figured. Now apply this to the poster I quoted. Good, we can move forward.

but but but Pac sued Floyd and won so where are you going to apply that?

[Wizardsh]

Floyd groupies getting owned in every thread

[The Big Dunn]

Nope, it simply means that Paulie has no reputation nor credibility to begin with so suing him is pointless. The simple fact that you even asked that just goes to show how dumb your IQ works. Even everyone here knows that Paulie is a ******.

So IYO Floyd not suing Hauser is an indication of guilt but Manny not suing Paulie is different. OK. I got it.

[BrometheusBob.]

Manny hasn't sued Paulie so does that mean Manny is a PED user?

[The Big Dunn]

but but but Pac sued Floyd and won so where are you going to apply that?

the same place I apply May 2nd, Floyd fought Pac and won.

Like I said move on. I got a response from the poster and he feels that Floyd not suing Hauser indicates guilt but Manny not suing Paulie is something else.

That's all I was asking. Go back to whining Rath.

[Rath]

the same place I apply May 2nd, Floyd fought Pac and won.

Like I said move on. I got a response from the poster and he feels that Floyd not suing Hauser indicates guilt but Manny not suing Paulie is something else.

That's all I was asking. Go back to whining Rath.

So Floyd won over Pac may 2nd is equal to

Pac suing Floyd and winning?

gotcha didn't i?

[The Big Dunn]

So Floyd won over Pac may 2nd is equal to

Pac suing Floyd and winning?

gotcha didn't i?

No, I asked a question and got an answer from the poster I asked. Nothing more to discuss.

[BrometheusBob.]

Nope, it simply means that Paulie has no reputation nor credibility to begin with so suing him is pointless. The simple fact that you even asked that just goes to show how dumb your IQ works. Even everyone here knows that Paulie is a ******.

This response is weak.

but but but Pac sued Floyd and won so where are you going to apply that?

This response is not.