Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: NSAC Must Punish Mayweather For IV Use!

[Spoon23]

I bet people back in the Philippines are eating this up .

I bet there some very outraged people back they are mad as fuck and I mean fuming mad like punching the wall cursing up storm and just

I have a strange feeling you've done it already. Don't hurt yourself kiddo it's just boxing. It's only Floyd's legacy that is going down the sewer system. Floyd is still standing and has lots of blings in his vault. No worries he is still loaded hehe

Don't punch a glass mirror now. It's bad luck.

[billeau2]

never thought of it this way.. but he insists he's retiring.. so I'm going to safely assume that even though he's the one with the shady tests? he's still gonna demand something like 85/15 split..

its all about the money they can make... I am of the opinion that they are squeezing Floyd into a rematch.

[Spoon23]

Just came in. Floyd's weigh-in weight is @ 146 lbs for the Berto Fight.



So tbe is that dehydrated and struggles to make weight that he weighed in a pound under?


+

Out of the mans own mouth...."I never had a problem making 147lbs"

=

Fraud


so the big question is?

Why do you need 750 ml of IV Fluids Floyd? Is it for dehydration or PEDs? You only get to choose one Floyd. So which is it?

[Weebler I]

People accused me, but in the end it was the other way around.

— Manny Pacquiao (@MrMannyPacquiao) September 11, 2015

Amen.

[Tomasio]

Someone needs to tell Pact a r d to stop drinking that sea water, obviously it's done a lot of damage to his brain..This incident with the IV happened in May & in June someone briefly brought up the subject & interviewed Floyd & now(4 months later & only a few days before Floyds next fight) all this BULL S H I T blows out of proportion when NSAC & USADA had already said it was OK 4 months ago..¿Did De La Hoya get in trouble for taking an IV before fighting Pacroid? NO! Oh, that's because he beat De La Hoya.But Pac t a r d & senile Arum have been looking for every BULL S H I T excuse to get a rematch they DON'T deserve..

[Spoon23]

Someone needs to tell Pact a r d to stop drinking that sea water, obviously it's done a lot of damage to his brain..This incident with the IV happened in May & in June someone briefly brought up the subject & interviewed Floyd & now(4 months later & only a few days before Floyds next fight) all this BULL S H I T blows out of proportion when NSAC & USADA had already said it was OK 4 months ago..¿Did De La Hoya get in trouble for taking an IV before fighting Pacroid? NO! Oh, that's because he beat De La Hoya.But Pac t a r d & senile Arum have been looking for every BULL S H I T excuse to get a rematch they DON'T deserve..

You mad? take it easy my friend. wether floyd is a ped cheat or a scum of the earth he still loves you hehehehe

[BrometheusBob.]

poochie is so dum he dont even know that floyd went thru every LEGAL loophole to do what he did,aint nothing gonna happen

no rematch for the pooch

emphasis on the bold

Wow, what a mess.

IV use is not prohibited under the NSAC. UFC fighters have been using it for many years, and it is only being banned now by USADA under the UFC-USADA partnership.

So is the NSAC mad at USADA for administering a TUE for a substance/practice that it itself does not prohibit? This **** is getting confusing haha.

Wait what?
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NAC/NAC-4...l#NAC467Sec850
"Any drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org."

http://boxing.nv.gov/faq/sections/Drugs_Medications/
"Where can I find more information on allowable drugs?"
Answer: WADA Program Prohibited List, USADA Guide to Prohibited List

Everything you can find on NSAC's website suggests they follow WADA protocol for what is banned. Where is everyone hearing otherwise exactly? And what does this have to do with the legitimate concern that it can mask PED use? I'm pretty sure that even if it isn't outright banned that they'd have to be notified of something in advance if it can alter drug test results.

In fact I'm sure I read on USADA's site that they expect prior TUE approval for IV fluids, and that they normally expect IV fluids to only be administered in hospital settings for emergencies, surgeries, or diagnostics (and even emergencies require TUE approval of fluids). NSAC has a reason to be concerned if USADA is bending it's rules for particular fighters, even if those rules aren't implemented by the NSAC themselves.

[BrometheusBob.]

All the fake outrage is funny to me. Is so obvious.

All you clowns wil be on the edge of your seats watching him fight tomorrow.

lol no I'm all good, I could spend my time doing literally anything else.

[doom_specialist]

emphasis on the bold


Wait what?
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NAC/NAC-4...l#NAC467Sec850
"Any drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org."

http://boxing.nv.gov/faq/sections/Drugs_Medications/
"Where can I find more information on allowable drugs?"
Answer: WADA Program Prohibited List, USADA Guide to Prohibited List

Everything you can find on NSAC's website suggests they follow WADA protocol for what is banned. Where is everyone hearing otherwise exactly? And what does this have to do with the legitimate concern that it can mask PED use? I'm pretty sure that even if it isn't outright banned that they'd have to be notified of something in advance if it can alter drug test results.

In fact I'm sure I read on USADA's site that they expect prior TUE approval for IV fluids, and that they normally expect IV fluids to only be administered in hospital settings for emergencies, surgeries, or diagnostics (and even emergencies require TUE approval of fluids). NSAC has a reason to be concerned if USADA is bending it's rules for particular fighters, even if those rules aren't implemented by the NSAC themselves.

Bob Bennett and USADA have both gone on record and noted that IV use isn't banned under Nevada rules, regardless of amount. The only time a TUE is required is when it is administered outside of a hospital.

If Mayweather had taken 20 minutes to drive to the hospital and complain of dehydration, there would be nothing to complain about, because then he wouldn't even need an NSAC TUE, but would need one from USADA (the one he already has). People alleging PED use are grasping at straws.

USADA spent years taking down Lance Armstrong, but are unabashedly bending corners for public enemy #1 Floyd Mayweather? I sincerely think not.

[hectari]

The nsac is not going to punish floyd, they should for this violation but floyd is untouchable in vegas. He got a slap on the wrist for beating his ex, and was allowed to fight first. Learn about politics, ill scratch your back if you scratch mine type deal. Ill be shock if the commission does the honorable thing and rules the fight a no contest.