your 1st paragraph suggests Floyd was actually dehydrated.
The urine provided by Mr. Mayweather on May 1, 2015, was subsequently tested and has been reported by the World Anti-Doping Agency accredited laboratory as negative.”
USADA says differently regarding when the request was made. Yes, the TUE was retroactive.
Why would you punish Floyd for this? You'd punish USADA, right?
I am not reading your debate with anyone else so I wouldn't know.
The harsh response suggests frustration. It must be frustrating when you want a decision changed but there isn't any reason to change it other than -"wahh I'm mad Floyd beat Manny".
The urine provided by Mr. Mayweather on May 1, 2015, was subsequently tested and has been reported by the World Anti-Doping Agency accredited laboratory as negative.”
USADA says differently regarding when the request was made. Yes, the TUE was retroactive.
Why would you punish Floyd for this? You'd punish USADA, right?
I am not reading your debate with anyone else so I wouldn't know.
The harsh response suggests frustration. It must be frustrating when you want a decision changed but there isn't any reason to change it other than -"wahh I'm mad Floyd beat Manny".
Comment