Man, even this article mentions what I have stated. Floyd told FightHype that it was "just rehydrating"
But once the scandal came to the surface, USADA couldn't get themselves to even say that it was dehydration!
The widely-reported justification for Mayweather’s IV is that it was administered to remedy dehydration. On September 11, Mayweather told an interviewer for FightHype.com that he’d been “just rehydrating.”
That’s also what USADA suggested to the Nevada State Athletic Commission when it advised the NSAC on May 21 (nineteen days after Mayweather-Pacquiao) that “the infusion was administered to address concerns related to dehydration.”
That’s also what USADA suggested to the Nevada State Athletic Commission when it advised the NSAC on May 21 (nineteen days after Mayweather-Pacquiao) that “the infusion was administered to address concerns related to dehydration.”
But once the scandal came to the surface, USADA couldn't get themselves to even say that it was dehydration!
One word that USADA’s “Detailed Correction” does not mention is “dehydrated.” Nor does it use “dehydration” or any derivative thereof.
Most likely, that’s because the available evidence strongly suggests that Floyd Mayweather was not dehydrated.
Most likely, that’s because the available evidence strongly suggests that Floyd Mayweather was not dehydrated.
Comment