Tweet
How is any of this relevant? What you are posting just proves that you need the medical records. Thanks 
What are the facts of this case?
1. He took a 750ml IV.
Which is illegal
2. It was approved by USADA
NSAC called it "Unacceptable"
Conte said "its against the rules"
Critics said "Floyd was not significantly dehydrated to warrant an IV.
3. It couldn't mask tests taken the next day.
I gave you 2 scenarios which makes this point irrelevant.
This is just a deflection. The date in question is May 1st. That is when Floyd delayed 6 hours to give his urine. Drank orally a lot and used an IV. All this will mask and distort the test. This goes against what even USADA preaches
4. He gave a partial urine sample before the IV.
Was it a drop, maybe more. Was it after a delay of 5 hours? It was then mixed with the sample after getting an IV.
5. He passed 19 drug tests.
Lance Armstrong passed 200+ tests.
What are your accusations for which you have no proof for?
1. He wasn't severely dehydrated (yet the ISTUE doesn't mention that he had to be).
WADA says this:
The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion
2. He micro-dosed (No proof)
Floyd masked with an IV. Distorted the evidence!
3. He masked (No proof)
IVs are used to mask. If Floyd's weight was relatively stable. Then it had to be for another reason. IV distorted the evidence!
4. He paid off USADA (No proof)
Floyd's representatives paid USADA 150K for 1 fight!!!
Lance's representatives paid UCI 100K for a year for drug testing. USADA called that unethical!!!!!!!!!
6. He masked again. (No proof)
See response to 3
7. Lance did it, so Mayweather did it (Anecdotal fallacy – using a personal experience or an isolated example instead of sound reasoning or compelling evidence.)
You are implying that it was difficult for Floyd to have used PEDs. Right? Insert Lance's name when you say that next time and then laugh then erase what you just wrote. That would be simpler!!!
This is quite clear.
What are the facts of this case?
1. He took a 750ml IV.
Which is illegal
2. It was approved by USADA
NSAC called it "Unacceptable"
Conte said "its against the rules"
Critics said "Floyd was not significantly dehydrated to warrant an IV.
3. It couldn't mask tests taken the next day.
I gave you 2 scenarios which makes this point irrelevant.
This is just a deflection. The date in question is May 1st. That is when Floyd delayed 6 hours to give his urine. Drank orally a lot and used an IV. All this will mask and distort the test. This goes against what even USADA preaches
4. He gave a partial urine sample before the IV.
Was it a drop, maybe more. Was it after a delay of 5 hours? It was then mixed with the sample after getting an IV.
5. He passed 19 drug tests.
Lance Armstrong passed 200+ tests.
What are your accusations for which you have no proof for?
1. He wasn't severely dehydrated (yet the ISTUE doesn't mention that he had to be).
WADA says this:
The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate. It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion
2. He micro-dosed (No proof)
Floyd masked with an IV. Distorted the evidence!
3. He masked (No proof)
IVs are used to mask. If Floyd's weight was relatively stable. Then it had to be for another reason. IV distorted the evidence!
4. He paid off USADA (No proof)
Floyd's representatives paid USADA 150K for 1 fight!!!
Lance's representatives paid UCI 100K for a year for drug testing. USADA called that unethical!!!!!!!!!
6. He masked again. (No proof)
See response to 3
7. Lance did it, so Mayweather did it (Anecdotal fallacy – using a personal experience or an isolated example instead of sound reasoning or compelling evidence.)
You are implying that it was difficult for Floyd to have used PEDs. Right? Insert Lance's name when you say that next time and then laugh then erase what you just wrote. That would be simpler!!!
This is quite clear.
I added the red and blue highlighted text. Its quite clear now
Comment