Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[travestyny]

I have over 180+ pages that say otherwise!!!!




THE TRUTH
You just scared DUCKY!!!!

Is that what you tell yourself so that you can sleep knowing that you got decapitated 4-0, claimed you were cheated, backed down from a challenge about proving you were cheated, backed down from your own challenge, and are too pvssy to ask for a rematch.


I'm pretty sure that means deep down you know you really lost. Do you actually think avoiding addressing a rematch, who really cheated, and then backing down from your own challenge makes you look like a bigshot or makes you look like you're too afraid because you know you legit lost

checkmate.

[ADP02]

I have over 180+ pages that say otherwise!!!!




THE TRUTH
You just scared DUCKY!!!!

[travestyny]

coming back..never thought that this topic is still having you guys going at it full swing..have to review..no, not really..will just wait if Pac May 2 happens...

Yooo, what' up man.

Nah. It's funny because the dude lost a debate 4-0 but it completely destroyed him and now it's just funny clowining him every now and then.


Didn't know you still post here. Haven't seen you in a long time. Welcome back.

[tangalog2200]

It's pretty clear from all of the quotations I've been finding that the exports have showed that YOU are wrong

AND THAT'S WHY YOU LOST 4-0 AND WOULD NEVER DREAM OF A REMATCH!

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/6rTQC2UiX9AOI/*****.gif[/IMG]

GAME OVER.

coming back..never thought that this topic is still having you guys going at it full swing..have to review..no, not really..will just wait if Pac May 2 happens...

[travestyny]

It's pretty clear from all of the quotations I've been finding that the experts have showed that YOU are wrong

The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

AND THAT'S WHY YOU LOST 4-0 AND WOULD NEVER DREAM OF A REMATCH!

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/6rTQC2UiX9AOI/*****.gif[/IMG]

GAME OVER.

[ADP02]

ADP COMPARING EPO TESTING TO CUPS OF ORANGE JUICE




Jesus Christ, you are a moron!

******DDDDDD!

and DUCKY still wasn't able to understand!!!!


Experts told you that you are wrong!


Waiting on DUCKY …….

[travestyny]

ADP COMPARING EPO TESTING TO CUPS OF ORANGE JUICE

Its simple. You have less than sufficient ... maybe half a glass of orange juice and you add a glass of water with a bit of orange mixed in. Do you have more or less concentration of orange juice?

Ok now pretend that is PEDs. One with potentially just above the threshold levels mixed in with urine sample that is below the threshold level and voila!! Invalid test!

Jesus Christ, you are a moron!

******DDDDDD!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

Yes, that's right idiot. If they find EPO in the test, then it's a positive. I think you know that now, don't you?

******DDDDDD!

DEFLECTOR, does NOT respond to my post which he knows that even recently he said that EPO has not and CANNOT have ever had threshold type tests! BUT now is DUCKING this challenge!



As for your post:
You DUCKING DUMBO, EPO IS naturally produced in the body. Synthetic EPO is NOT produced in the body!


The 2 are similar in many ways and when looking at results, there can be ambiguity. It is NOT straight forward where one can get the result where there is a quantifiable amount of synthetic EPO or that there is no amount quantified. At times, the test results can look su****ious but the tester will not conclude it as a positive for rEPO.


You on the other hand have said there is an image and that is it! WRONG! There is more to it than that. There IS SCIENCE involved! It is complex and there can be mistakes made along the way including determining the result as postive or negative!


Making this mistake before is acceptable. You still making these mistakes at this point in time is NOT! Especially when you call the other person names and YOU, the DUCK, is WRONG!!!


****** is interpreting that every EXPERT who called an EPO test a threshold type test is wrong and you are right! Now you are no longer confident once I challenged you on this, DUCKY!!!!



CHALLENGE IS ON!

.... BUT we are dealing with DUCKY the QUACK!


Deal with the TRUTH! YOU are SCARED!!!!

[IMG]https://media1.*****.com/media/3o7TKqnN349PBUtGFO/*****.gif[/IMG]



.

[travestyny]

Similar with EPO .... they may have a su****ious result but still state it as negative. You said that if there is any EPO, it will be flagged as positive. EPO like I said and now you know, its produced naturally in the body.

Yes, that's right idiot. If they find EPO in the test, then it's a positive. I think you know that now, don't you?

******DDDDDD!

[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

[B] COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT:

I explained it to DUCKY but he is still STUCK ON ******!


and that is why he is DUCKING THIS CHALLENGE!!!



I saw that list BEFORE the challenge DUCKY! Right DUCKY?

I explained to you that there is a difference between that list and what I was talking about. There can still be a threshold type test without it being on that list of threshold substances! That is what I meant and you know that. If you didn't by now then you are one DUMB QUACK!!!!


Even in the debate,
1) you AGREED to that debate BUT like these current 175+ pages, YOU DUCKED from the challenge
2) and backtracked on your initial statements!

SCOPE:
"Does or can there be threshold test"

"example: 4/1 Ratio (T/E) test"


and more


DUCKY: "I'm fine with that"
"There are no thresholds, no ratios, scores, …. none of that"


Then came 100 pages of backtracking …..



THIS TIME, YOU NEEDED TO AGREE TO THE ACTUAL TOPIC/SCOPE and YOU QUACKED every time by either DUCKING to a different challenge or pretending to accept but if one read your post's fine print, one would realize that the LIAR and CHEATER is Travestyny, the DUCK!!!



FINALLY, WADA/USADA disagrees with you on all counts!

WHY THE IV RULE?

To protect clean sport and athlete health and safety. It is a fact that IVs can be used to change blood test results (such as hematocrit where EPO or blood doping is being used), mask urine test results (by dilution) or by administering prohibited substances in a way that will more quickly be cleared from the body in order to beat an anti-doping test.

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons.

This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.

In summary,
this DUCK, said that only threshold substances can be tested by way of threshold type tests. I disagreed with him! DUCKY CANNOT get himself to agree to the challenge so he needs to DEFLECT!






You were defending Nick Diaz

BUT Nick Diaz was caught 3 times and suspended 3 times for marijuana use and in those cases, he tried to dilute his urine samples!

Nick Diaz admits to marijuana use!

Nick Diaz's sample results all had levels of marijuana and some were over the threshold!


Even after all of that, Nick Diaz was suspended again by USADA

On April 9, 2018, Diaz accepted a one-year USADA sanction for failing to report his whereabouts to USADA on three occasions from the third quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2017. The sanction is retroactive to April 9, 2017, and Diaz would be eligible to compete again on April 9, 2018

DUCKY is AGAIN trying to defend a CHEAT!!!


Finally, when we were debating that, you were claiming that what I stated was BS but now I read recent posts of yours bringing up what I stated!

WHAT A CLOWN!!!


.




.