NSAC v. USADA

[Eastcoast]

USADA actually makes the sport more dangerous. They allow you to customize how you want the drug testing done, then protect the house fighter from testing positive while making sure his opponent is clean.

[noStylez]

So Pac was right, let the commission do their job...Floyd is one shifty character and USADA ain't any different.

[sicko]

Just remember: during the initial negotiations when NSAC was first called out about its testing, the Kizer NSAC doubled down on its 'our-testing-is-sufficient' stance.

And there were a TON of folks in boxing media and on boxing forums loudly and repeatedly DEFENDING that stance. Times sure have changed, haven't they?

NSAC is reaping what it sowed.

Exactly!

[torosboxing75]

Just remember: during the initial negotiations when NSAC was first called out about its testing, the Kizer NSAC doubled down on its 'our-testing-is-sufficient' stance.

And there were a TON of folks in boxing media and on boxing forums loudly and repeatedly DEFENDING that stance. Times sure have changed, haven't they?

NSAC is reaping what it sowed.

Yup! It's their fault Floyds a cheater.

[Sweet Jones]

Yup! It's their fault Floyds a cheater.

Had the NSAC simply heeded the advice of dayum near every other expert at the time (Margaret Goodman, Conte, Tygart, Caitlin, etc.) and even its biggest star and box office attraction (Mayweather) instead of defending its woefully out of date testing scope, there would no conflicting agencies to give out TUEs.

But for the NSAC: "This is the business we've chosen!!' (Hyman Roth's voice)

[maguirre]

Any chance we can see this guy gets investigated by Drew Griffin of CNN? His reports on fake charities in the US were very revealing.

Why is this guy seem untouchable?