Comments Thread For: Hauser Hits Back at USADA Over Mayweather/IV Scandal
Collapse
-
-
Top Rank chairman Bob Arum, Pacquiao's promoter, also was upset by the situation.
"USADA has a lot of explaining to do," Arum told ESPN. "When we learned about this I was outraged. But I can't just bay at the moon. What legal redress do we have? I have the information, our lawyers got it, but what were we supposed to do with it? Ask for the decision to be reversed? I really think people have to look closely at USADA and investigate what's going on with them."
Arum also said the reason he didn't go public when he received the news that Mayweather had been granted the TUE retroactively because he was bound by a confidentiality clause in the contract with Mayweather. But once the matter became public, he discussed it.
"Our lawyers told us that the information tramsmitted to us was confidential and we were not allowed to disseminate it, so based on that advice we said nothing [until it came out]," Arum said.
- ESPNComment
-
Comment
-
Real testing would be. But accusing others of being on PEDs and asking for a drug testing protocol that is corrupt and under your control with loop holes to allow you to get away with cheating is not for boxing. Homey this is the wrong day to try and parade the "Mayweather wants testing to clean up boxing" point. He's a fraud and we now have more reason to think he is on PEDs then the people he bashed for years.Comment
-
David Mayo ***8207;@David_Mayo · 1h1 hour ago
USADA's passive-aggressiveness in not agreeing to Hauser interview, then harpooning report as agenda-driven & inaccurate, is troubling.Comment
-
All of this is supposition and speculation predicated on the fact Mayweather took advantage of retroactive clause in the compliance contract. Until there is/are actual samples of urine/blood proving his guilt, everyone can go eff themselves. This by no means saying he is guilty or innocent, but looks like a conviction in the court of public opinion.Comment
-
Why do you think he went over the allowed amount? Dehydration?Comment
Comment