All of this is supposition and speculation predicated on the fact Mayweather took advantage of retroactive clause in the compliance contract. Until there is/are actual samples of urine/blood proving his guilt, everyone can go eff themselves. This by no means saying he is guilty or innocent, but looks like a conviction in the court of public opinion.
How many drug tests did Lance Armstrong fail? Or Barry Bonds? Makes it even tougher to fail a drug test when you have your own hand picked drug testing agency that is in your pocket lying and corrupt as hell trying sweep violations under the rug.
Well that's the thing, nobody knows. Because what he did apparently flushes the system, so it's kind of hard to determine if he destroyed the evidence?
Well that's the thing, nobody knows. Because what he did apparently flushes the system, so it's kind of hard to determine if he destroyed the evidence?
Its like the guy who runs from the police and then claims but i didnt do nothing doe
Lance Armstrong tested clean more than any athlete in history, and under a far more rigorous year round testing program. He and his teammates, and most of the athletes, were caught or came forward, because the testing organizations started threatening people with suspensions, if they did not volunteer evidence about Lance.
If a test catches you, it's only because you made a mistake. Doping has always been two steps ahead of the testing for it.
If Cycling history has shown us anything it is that "IV rehydration" has alway been used as the go to excuses for being caught with blood doping equipment.
Caught with a transfusion bag, and butterfly needles? Oh it's not for blood doping, it's just for rehydration and vitamins, I promise.
That promise works wonderfully, since none of the tests can detect any of the drugs or doping they are doing anyways.
this is what the floyd fans are trying to obtusely shoulder roll.
great post.
look at them,
asking questions like well what drug did floyd take? yea, what drug did pacquiao take?
lol dont these floyd **********s love to use the word double standards????
Well that's the thing, nobody knows. Because what he did apparently flushes the system, so it's kind of hard to determine if he destroyed the evidence?
But he was tested both before taking the IV and right after taking it as well as after the fight. 3 times in 2 days. Passed all.
If he was flushing the one taken before would have caught it.
Lance Armstrong tested clean more than any athlete in history, and under a far more rigorous year round testing program. He and his teammates, and most of the athletes, were caught or came forward, because the testing organizations started threatening people with suspensions, if they did not volunteer evidence about Lance.
If a test catches you, it's only because you made a mistake. Doping has always been two steps ahead of the testing for it.
If Cycling history has shown us anything it is that "IV rehydration" has alway been used as the go to excuses for being caught with blood doping equipment.
Caught with a transfusion bag, and butterfly needles? Oh it's not for blood doping, it's just for rehydration and vitamins, I promise.
That promise works wonderfully, since none of the tests can detect any of the drugs or doping they are doing anyways.
You really think they just said OK and didnt check to make sure the bags were what they said they were
Tweet
HAUSER is the one who's in trouble? U aphasic, doe... (excuse me...)
Comment