Here's a question. Did USADA request a sample of what Floyd used in the IV? I'm guessing no, they must have just taken his word for it and gave him the TUE.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather Under Hot Fire Over USADA/IV Scandal
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -Hyperion- View PostAnd if USADA operated with transparency, no one would refute the claim that CIR was used. This is about drug testing being better regulated, but you guys need to defend floyd at all costs...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostI never argued anything about it being transparent enough or not. In fact my original point had nothing to do with that. If u don't trust USADA then don't trust them. That's a fair criticism. But that doesn't change the point that Hauser was reaching with plenty of his points in this article. If u omit stuff and then add unnecessary stuff to bolster points that don't rrally exist then it takes away from the message being relayed. It's that simple.
Read about how the IV was cleared and tell me that isn't shady as hell... Even the NSAC had to go on record condemning it and saying it can't happen again.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by -Hyperion- View PostYou say you didn't read, but criticise anyway...
Read about how the IV was cleared and tell me that isn't shady as hell... Even the NSAC had to go on record condemning it and saying it can't happen again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View Post
No I did not say I didn't read it. Smh. Learn to read broOriginally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostExcept for the fact that the USADA are already on record stating that they have used CIR testing in every floyd fight since before pacquiao. I don't have to read the article because I actually keep up on this stuff. And it still doesn't refute my point. Showing those two samples mean next to nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Hyperion- View PostIf you can't see how that can be interpreted as such, then you need to learn to write a little less ambiguosly. Bro. More importantly you went and ignored the IV deal. Is it shady or not?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostIt shouldn't be interpreted as anything besides whst I said. Which is "I didn't have to read it." If u then assumed I didn't then the fault blows with u and your reading comprehension skills. This isn't a logic game. If I didn't read it I would have said I didn't read it. But I clearly didn't say that. In fact in an earlier comment, I state that he made some good points.
Get off on semantics(ambiguous as they are), keep dodging the question. You're not his lawyer bro.
Comment
Comment