There are posters in this thread that only count titles as meaningful when a fighter they like wins one or is pursuing one?
If titles are worthless, then they should be worthless all the time. FOR EXAMPLE, I see posters in this thread that have frequently praised GGG for "trying to unify all the belts" yet are now demeaning the titles Berto won.
It just seems very selective and random.
Is Berto a top fighter right now, no. Let's not demean his titles when we celebrate belts won in other cases.
If titles are worthless, then they should be worthless all the time. FOR EXAMPLE, I see posters in this thread that have frequently praised GGG for "trying to unify all the belts" yet are now demeaning the titles Berto won.
It just seems very selective and random.
Is Berto a top fighter right now, no. Let's not demean his titles when we celebrate belts won in other cases.
Comment