Hagler/Hearns/Duran would destroy GGG

[HanzGruber]

To even mention Golovkin with those ATGs is an insult to boxing.

Seriously hey op sugar Ray Leonard would destroy josesito lopez

[Robbie Barrett]

Duran would be obliterated by GGG

Hearns has a punchers chance but would likely be knocked out.

Best match is Hagler who would be a considerably large underdog against Golovkin.

Those are the facts.

OP hits us with another standard hate filled thread.

Pathetic!

Those aren't facts. Those are the opinions of poster that has an obsession with white European fighters, the bigger the better and it's not just height is it Elroy?

[mathed]

ummm, hearns was what, 40 years old by then?
poor argument there.
and questioning Duran in any way is just ignorant.

GGG is a joke.

FACT.

Great, now the Ward fans are creating alts to get at GGG, lol

[boliodogs]

How the hell do you know that? You can't be proven wrong because he can never fight these guys. In real life, not fantasy land, GGG has never lost a fight and has won almost all his fights by KO. He has never been knocked down in over 400 amateur and pro fights. He must be pretty good if you have to go back in time to try to get him beat. A prime Duran lost to an unknown and unranked fighter named Kirkland Lang. Don't you think GGG is better than Kirkland Lang? I'm sure you'll say Duran had an off night when he lost to Lang. GGG never has an off night and he almost always wins by KO. I love Hearns but he was knocked out by Iran Barkley and GGG is a better fighter and a harder puncher than Barkley. If GGG lost to Hagler that would hardly be a disgrace. Hagler is very likely the best middleweight in history. I know you hate GGG but try to beat him with middleweights that are here now. Don't ask him to beat ghosts from the past because no fighter can do that. It's impossible.

[Greenbeanz]

Hate-filled? Isnt that presumptuous and judgemental? Yes!

[boliodogs]

Your 2nd post and you are trashing GGG. I hope your stay on boxing scene is a short one because you are a negative person trashing an excellent fighter who does not deserve to get trashed.

[Access_Denied]

To even mention Golovkin with those ATGs is an insult to boxing.

This. I agree.

[boliodogs]

Hate-filled? Isnt that presumptuous and judgemental? Yes!

If you don't hate GGG why would you go to the trouble of starting a thread getting him KOed in a few rounds by fighters from 30 years ago????? It isn't presumptuous to say you hate GGG. It's obvious you hate him and saying you don't hate him doesn't fool anybody, fool.

[Redd Foxx]

Hearns would put him away similar to how he did Duran. It's just ignorant to think Golovkin would hold up against that range, speed, and pressure. He looks bothered when the cans hefights start to put up an offense. Hearns would blitz him and the required defense just wouldn't be there.
Haggler might go into the mid/late rounds but wouldn't be troubled, IMO.
Duran I'm not so sure. Could go a number of ways, depending which Duran showed up. That's a fight I'd like to see.

[Greenbeanz]

ARE WE NOT ALLOWED TO TRASH A FIGHTER HERE? JUST POSITIVE KISSES AND HUGS?
YOU HOPE MY STAY IS A SHORT ONE? GEE, THANKS, JERK.
I'M A NEGATIVE PERSON BECAUSE I THINK THOSE 3 WOULD BEAT GGG? BUt if I had said GGG could beat those 3, that would have been a POSITIVE PERSON? That'd be OK with you, hmm?

Are you 1 of those people who thinks everyone is negative if they don't say pretty pink positive things? What a way to try and shut down opposing views!