cotto can probably get away with immediately vacating, but if canelo wins and then drops the belt straight away, he will face serious backlash. he's a young guy in his prime, he should be trying to forge a legacy. cotto's legacy is already more or less set and his fans will support him regardless of what happens now
Comments Thread For: WBC is Firm: Cotto-Canelo winner must face GGG next!
Collapse
-
I think people are forgetting
Cotto/Canelo 2 would still be for the lineal Middleweight Championship of the world
They can vacate the WBC title, but the winner would still be the lineal champion
The WBC will get their split in a rematch by sanctioning a Diamond championship or some other abomination of a beltComment
-
cotto can probably get away with immediately vacating, but if canelo wins and then drops the belt straight away, he will face serious backlash. he's a young guy in his prime, he should be trying to forge a legacy. cotto's legacy is already more or less set and his fans will support him regardless of what happens nowComment
-
Until they sign to fight someone else, and you make another excuse for them.
You were "firm" that Cotto would have to fight Golovkin after Geale. How did that work out?Comment
-
Comment
-
That's the idea...
The whole WBC bla-bla is shit, actually...Comment
-
Comment
-
“GGG-Lemieux tix pre-sale began Tues & has already sold over 5k tix. Best pre-sale MSG has had, surpassing Wladimir-Jennings & Cotto-Margarito 2,” After this fight GGG is a bigger draw than Cotto. GGG vs Mayweather, or Cotto, or Canelo is bigger than Mayweather vs Cotto or Canelo.Comment
-
Also, anyone can weigh anything for any weightclass as long as they're not over the limit.Comment
-
I think people are forgetting
Cotto/Canelo 2 would still be for the lineal Middleweight Championship of the world
They can vacate the WBC title, but the winner would still be the lineal champion
The WBC will get their split in a rematch by sanctioning a Diamond championship or some other abomination of a beltLast edited by kiaba360; 08-12-2015, 12:39 PM.Comment
Comment