I've actually unliked Manny from facebook because . . .

[Beercules]

[vaborikua2014]

Great ****ing thread. Lots of great boxing news here.

[PACBOY]

you should 'like' him again...he changed and is posting pics of hoes and cars...he's even giving away $100 to every 100th person that likes his pics of hoes

lmfao....green k for that

[sugarsmosley]

team pacquiao to the end baby






we stay loyal

[silentscoper]

Careful, MPX309

[LADIV]

Guess what? Manny doesn't care. You're just one less REAL fan he has. Who wouldn't or doesn't like Manny Pacquiao? I should Red K you for wasting my time. Smh. Get lost with this "little" BS.

GODFR33 speaking to an atheist ...the fcukin irony

[STAX ON DECK]

yea he needs to go back to ****ing hookers raw for a testosterone increase i could feel a aggressive manny on the come up again

[soul_survivor]

I actually unliked his FB page for pretty much the same reason. I believe in God and it's great to thank him but stop polluting my FB wall with the Christian, born again rubbish (sorry born again Christians). Plus he just comes across as a hypocrite after his recent actions.

[TheStranger]

I absolutely share this sentiment, though it is kind of a disappointing thing to acknowledge, ya know? It would be comforting if I could believe that we were all here for a reason, each destined to accomplish something or be part of something bigger than ourselves. But I feel like that's such an anthropocentric viewpoint - what are the odds that a few billion people on one planet occupying an almost insignificant portion of the universe, and during an almost insignificant portion of time that the universe has existed, have true value to the totality of existence? I personally believe that there may not be any true 'purpose' to life given to us, other than what we make of it.

Let me be clear I wasn't referring to the (anthropocentric) "meaning of life" as mocked by the likes Nietzsche and the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Specifically, I was referring to the recent and still speculative proposal put forth by MIT professor Jeremy England which suggests that atoms, when driven by an external source of energy (such as the sun) and surrounded by a heat bath (such as the ocean or atmosphere), will rearrange themselves into living systems which we know are better at capturing energy and dissipating it as heat than are inanimate clumps of carbon atoms. "You start with a random clump of atoms, and if you shine light on it for long enough, it should not be so surprising that you get a plant," England said.
It's possible. I was saying rather that the sober men of science are a longer way from explaining how the universe sprang from nothing for no reason. I'm not attempting either to create an entrance for God in the gaps, so calm down atheists. It doesn't matter to me if God exists or not -- hoping for won't change it. I just find the answer sometimes proffered that it is "because something rather than nothing is the natural state of things" sounds to me like a cop-out or a way of saying because we don't know then an answer must not exist or be possible. I like to say we don't know what we don't know! And also the man who claims to know knows not, the man who claims not to know knows.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a really ****** book BTW. The meaning of life is 42. Get it?! It's supposed to be funny because it's a number.

[Mr. Philadel]

Guess what? Manny doesn't care. You're just one less REAL fan he has. Who wouldn't or doesn't like Manny Pacquiao? I should Red K you for wasting my time. Smh. Get lost with this "little" BS.

LMAO

dude made a thread about cutting Pac loose on FB.... wtf is this world becoming!! LMAO