Comments Thread For: Khan Eyes Fall Return, Explains Why it Won't Be Brook

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gmc_rfc_06
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 9486
    • 282
    • 131
    • 16,947

    #41
    Originally posted by Jubei
    Are you UK fans still buying tickets for that clown? It's sad people still support such a cowardly liar and loser.

    I really hope Brook fights Thurman, beats him and then gets a Pacuqiao or even Mayweather fight while Khan gets knocked silly by his next cherrypick.

    No way Khan will face any serious puncher or dangerous fighter at Welterweight.
    UK fans?

    Khan doesn't fight in the UK. Even then, he doesn't sell out venues in the US either.

    Pretty much everyone knows what Khan is at this point; a fighter avoiding punchers at all costs.

    Comment

    • Gary Coleman
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 3451
      • 1,021
      • 898
      • 13,777

      #42
      Love him or hate him, Khan makes good points here.

      Comment

      • G_Child_123
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jul 2011
        • 365
        • 4
        • 0
        • 6,510

        #43
        I see Khan has failed to mention Brook's career best win to date, how dumb does he think boxing fans are?

        You could probably get a bit more money in the purse if Khan and Brook both register solid wins over autumn/winter time, but never gonna be £100 million!

        Comment

        • doom_specialist
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2006
          • 1720
          • 120
          • 193
          • 27,396

          #44
          I wouldn't have an issue with Khan saying that Brook needs to fight those guys if Khan himself was also trying to fight them too. Brook already has a better resume at 147 than Khan does simply because he beat Porter. No amount Khan's spin doctoring can change that.

          Comment

          • soul_survivor
            LOL @ Ali-Holmes
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 18949
            • 623
            • 473
            • 65,236

            #45
            Khan v Porter or Bradley really, anything else is a bit of a waste. Maybe Khan v Broner just so Khan can lay a beating on him lol

            Comment

            • G_Child_123
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2011
              • 365
              • 4
              • 0
              • 6,510

              #46
              Originally posted by Gary Coleman
              Love him or hate him, Khan makes good points here.
              In terms of proving himself at welterweight, the same points apply to Khan. Fight the likes of Thurman and Bradley. He beat Maidana at light-welterweight some time ago now so for him to drag his own resume up like that is scraping the barrel.

              Or better yet, Khan and Brook can fight each other!

              The money for this fight is here right now, and it ain't gonna generate much more.

              Comment

              • brettWall
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 6624
                • 684
                • 220
                • 18,355

                #47
                Same old story. Brook fans/Khan haters don't want to see Brook vs Thurman, which is the more meaningful fight. I don't effing know why.

                Comment

                • .:: JSFD26 ::.
                  Brawski
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 33329
                  • 725
                  • 432
                  • 44,762

                  #48
                  I dont care what his reasons are but the fact is that Kell Brook has a belt. There's no excuse as to why you shouldn't fight him. Who wouldn't want a belt whether his opponent faced top names or not?

                  Comment

                  • PRBOXINGCOTTO
                    PRBOXINGCOTTO
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 8566
                    • 266
                    • 147
                    • 15,057

                    #49
                    brook beat porter khan has done nothing since the Peterson loss so what is he talking about khan will not make more than 10eu lol he is crazy

                    Comment

                    • brettWall
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 6624
                      • 684
                      • 220
                      • 18,355

                      #50
                      Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
                      I dont care what his reasons are but the fact is that Kell Brook has a belt. There's no excuse as to why you shouldn't fight him. Who wouldn't want a belt whether his opponent faced top names or not?
                      You don't care what his reasons are, yet you do. What about yours, why don't you want Thurman, instead of Khan for Brook.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP