Comments Thread For: Khan Eyes Fall Return, Explains Why it Won't Be Brook
Collapse
-
-
-
I see Khan has failed to mention Brook's career best win to date, how dumb does he think boxing fans are?
You could probably get a bit more money in the purse if Khan and Brook both register solid wins over autumn/winter time, but never gonna be £100 million!Comment
-
I wouldn't have an issue with Khan saying that Brook needs to fight those guys if Khan himself was also trying to fight them too. Brook already has a better resume at 147 than Khan does simply because he beat Porter. No amount Khan's spin doctoring can change that.Comment
-
Khan v Porter or Bradley really, anything else is a bit of a waste. Maybe Khan v Broner just so Khan can lay a beating on him lolComment
-
In terms of proving himself at welterweight, the same points apply to Khan. Fight the likes of Thurman and Bradley. He beat Maidana at light-welterweight some time ago now so for him to drag his own resume up like that is scraping the barrel.
Or better yet, Khan and Brook can fight each other!
The money for this fight is here right now, and it ain't gonna generate much more.Comment
-
I dont care what his reasons are but the fact is that Kell Brook has a belt. There's no excuse as to why you shouldn't fight him. Who wouldn't want a belt whether his opponent faced top names or not?Comment
-
brook beat porter khan has done nothing since the Peterson loss so what is he talking about khan will not make more than 10eu lol he is crazyComment
-
You don't care what his reasons are, yet you do. What about yours, why don't you want Thurman, instead of Khan for Brook.Comment
Comment