Tweet
Between this 2 fights, which one are you interested the most? 
-
-
Cotto /Canelo.
Come on dude. -
Rigo vs Lomachenko is the better fight.
Cotto vs Canelo the better event.
As a huge fan of Rigo, and a pretty big fan of Lomachenko, this fight is the fight I want to see.Comment
-
loma-rigo. rigo is the undisputed best sbw, and loma the best fw. both are comfortably top 5 p4p most skilled boxers
cotto-canelo is just a fight between two guys who would be annihilated by golovkinComment
-
Why decide when you can have both?
That being said, Loma-Rigo although Canelo-Cotto will be fun as long as Cotto is still standing.Comment
-
Rigo vs Loma for me. Always wanted it to happen & never thought it would. Cotto vs Saul way bigger though.Comment
-
It's like this. Rigo vs Loma is the more important boxing fight. It's a once in a lifetime type of fight. It's what boxing is all about.
Cotto/Canelo is a "big" fan friendly fight, but it's not as important historically speaking... Neither fighter is as technically or athletically gifted as Loma or Rigo.
Rigo/Loma is a Floyd/Manny level type fight... The difference being no one knows about these guys...
Loma-Rigo SHOULD be a big PPV fight...but since people prefer to watch guys dance around the basketball floor or chill in the outfield with their pajamas, boxing rarely gets the attention it deserves.Comment
-
I'm glad I don't have to choose. I'm pretty sure Cotto/Alvarez would be the better fight, but the skill level between Rigo and Lomachenko would be off the charts. That might lead to a more boring fight, but the purist in me would love it, just like I did Rigo/Donaire despite it being one-sided.Comment
-
If Rigo/Loma is truly on the horizon, it makes Floyd's last cherry pick fight even more forgetfulComment
Comment