Comments Thread For: Brook Replaces Froch at Top UK Fighter, Says Moore

[TheStranger]

Brook hasn't been eager enough to follow up the Porter win with anything significant is why I would hesitate to rank him above Khan. I have it a tie.

[talz]

One good win in 10 years as a pro. Think about this very carefully brooktards.

[LacedUp]

One good win in 10 years as a pro. Think about this very carefully brooktards.

That one win is better than anything Khan has done in 5 years or ever actually. Think about that.

[LacedUp]

I personally put it on par with Brook-Porter, but Kell has attached his name with Khan to become a star for years now, so now its paying off.

How was it on level? Dirrell hadn't fought a top guy since he quit vs Abraham YEARS ago and many people felt DeGale was a favourite in that fight.

Brook was a clear underdog.

[MrRolltide91]

this is why khan and brook should fight each other

[Jubei]

If you compare Brook vs Khan

- Khan has faced a couple more good B Class fighters

- Brook has faced Shawn Porter in his backyard and took his belt, that win is better than all of Khans recent wins

- Brook never lost

- Khan got knocked out a couple times, even c level Breidis Prescott

I mean you could argue who is the more impressive fighter here but then you have the following facts:

Brook is calling out Khan

Khan is ducking Brook

Brook gets more and more popular

Khan makes a fool out of himself more and more and loses fans / respect

Brook > Khan

[MrRolltide91]

Khan is obviously still the biggest name in the UK, especially now that froch is gone

Brook is probably the better fighter at this point, but in terms of stardom, it's still khan

this.......

[Box-Office]

Why are you belittling Jamie Moore?

Wow, your vagina has grown a lot recently. Anything positive about Brook and you get a mental breakdown. Just face the fact that people like Brook over Khan.

Yes, if everyone believes Brook is a better welterweight than Khan then yes. He must be the consensus better fighter? It has nothing to do with his title, Brook has always been ranked above Khan in the WW rankings.

Well Gavin never fought at light welterweight? Not that anybody gives a fook about Gavin, why are you trying to say it like I've ever said it was a good win?

Brook is the top UK fighter if they fought in the UK, in the US or on the moon.

You said "accolades". Moore giving someone "accolades" is a bit weird wouldn't you say? I'm not belittling him.

Mate, you pop in every thread calling me Khan"turd", Khan-turd/butthurt. I don't mind, but it goes to show the irony when you claim I'm the one with a mental breakdown given the venom that oozes out of that name calling all because I criticized Brook. I presented genuine argument.

I don't care if people like Brook over Khan more because that is clearly the variable being utilized to justify putting him above Khan. Amir was booed against Barrera in Manchester, which is before his delusional days, so there is that.

Also it is about UK's #1 over all and not just WWs. You brought up WW rankings "specifically". Even at WW Khan is better than Brook because all he has is 1 good win, but again it is UK's top fighter OVER ALL.

Even Moore says himself Khan has more World level wins, but it detracts from his popularity here cuz he is in States. So, basically he admits Khan is more accomplished, but hey I like Brook, so I'll go with him. Then you ask why I/m annoyed at him while he spews pure garbage.

Go back and read the article again.

[Box-Office]

That one win is better than anything Khan has done in 5 years or ever actually. Think about that.

This is mortifying stuff right here.

[daggum]

no love for david price? pretty sure he's going to dominate british boxing for the next 10+ years