Comments Thread For: Brook Replaces Froch at Top UK Fighter, Says Moore

[Grange_27]

I personally put it on par with Brook-Porter, but Kell has attached his name with Khan to become a star for years now, so now its paying off.

Brook attached his name to Khan? Really? So it wasn't him beating Porter for the world title at Welterweight (something Khan has failed to do) it was the fact he's well up for knocking out old glass jaw Khan and Khan doesn't want to know.

Now if you want an example of someone attaching themselves to a fighter desperately trying to get them to notice him ... Step forward Amir Khan who is literally begging Floyd for some crumbs of his table. Kind of pathetic really no?

[BodiesInFlight]

I personally put it on par with Brook-Porter, but Kell has attached his name with Khan to become a star for years now, so now its paying off.

Crediting Khan for Brooks career. Wow.

You're getting worse mate.

[BodiesInFlight]

No love for James DeGale? His win over Dirrell> any of Kell Brook Wins so far! Big fan of both though!

I think a case could be made for either of those and Frampton too.

[SUBZER0ED]

If Brook fights mainly in the UK as Froch did, his name won't mean much in the US, as Froch's didn't.

[Box-Office]

Crediting Khan for Brooks career. Wow.

You're getting worse mate.

No.

The point I'm making is the reason Brook is so relevant is not just because of his resume, but being attached with Khan. Having 1 great win in 35 fights (10 years) isn't much of a career anyways.

[John Locke]

You could certainly make a case for Kell being the best UK fighter atm. He needs to do more to prove it, but he's definitely got the skill. Everybody has acknowledged that Amir is ducking him, so he now needs to look beyond that fight and fight some other top welterweights.

He'll be real hard to beat imo, the only guy I would confidently pick to beat him at 147 is Floyd.

[Damiens]

Kell Brook deserves it imo. He's in a much hotter division with better things on the horizon for him.

[LacedUp]

Kell-end ****** throwing tantrums.

Oh yeah accolades from Jamie Moore. Now tell me who the hell is Jamie Moore?

So, everyone else has it, so it must be true right? What logic is that? Mate, Ring has Brook above Pacquiao ffs, so much for rankings. As for being rated above Khan its all because he holds a title. Keep hiding behind that. At the end who remembers which version of the title did Leonard-Hearns competed for? Its about names.

Brook fans are funny. "Algieri is a LWW doe." Wtf was Gavin? LOL

Yeah, on Sky.

Why are you belittling Jamie Moore?

Wow, your vagina has grown a lot recently. Anything positive about Brook and you get a mental breakdown. Just face the fact that people like Brook over Khan.

Yes, if everyone believes Brook is a better welterweight than Khan then yes. He must be the consensus better fighter? It has nothing to do with his title, Brook has always been ranked above Khan in the WW rankings.

Well Gavin never fought at light welterweight? Not that anybody gives a fook about Gavin, why are you trying to say it like I've ever said it was a good win?

Brook is the top UK fighter if they fought in the UK, in the US or on the moon.

[miniq]

Wonder how long till brook can't physically make 147 anymore...he is looking pretty borderline already.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Khan is obviously still the biggest name in the UK, especially now that froch is gone

Brook is probably the better fighter at this point, but in terms of stardom, it's still khan