Is it now safe to say that Mayweather is the greatest fighter of his generation?

[therealpugilist]

Pacquiao lost to Morales/Marquez. It's not just his excitement but his risks, I think he took much greater risks than Floyd. That is why I respect him more. I used to like the younger Floyd, he took more risks. When you follow the money, you lose some of the greatness. Kellerman said something about that and I fully agree.

they are prize fighters

they fight for a prize which is money

when he was all humble calling everyone out and a 2 division lineal champion, no one cared about him in his early and mid 20's and he'd been on the p4p list since 1998

when brought that money persona people wanted to see him lose...it was genius in my eyes

[Eli Grinding]

the coward got out the kitchen went it got to hot (retire) lmfao. greatest pssh you dudes DKSAB

Gave your idol a boxing lesson so STFU.

[Mr.Fantastic]

so pacqiuoa took more risks for fighting marqez and morales??floyd toyed with maqruez and would have easily outworked morales and barrera who are considered pacs best wins

pacs WW resume is complete garbage compare to floyd who took way more risks going up to 154 to fight oscar,cotto,canelo

but like i said before,pac seemed to have gained the respect of mexican boxing fans whilist floyd stays being hated by them even though both ran thryu the mexicans with ease

He didn't just fight Morales and Marquez. Floyd easily beat Marquez, I know that but Marquez had to climb how many divisions to fight? Floyd is not a big risk taker. Don't you complain that Broner is too small for 147?

You're going too much into fantasy mode. Fantasy fights shouldn't be a part on judging a boxer's greatness.

Floyd jumped 5 divisions, Pac jumped 7/8. It's easy math.

Whitaker is one of my all time favorite boxers, even he took more risks than Floyd. If Floyd were to of taken more risks, I'd be with Larry and people like you debating against other people.

[Mr.Fantastic]

they are prize fighters

they fight for a prize which is money

when he was all humble calling everyone out and a 2 division lineal champion, no one cared about him in his early and mid 20's and he'd been on the p4p list since 1998

when brought that money persona people wanted to see him lose...it was genius in my eyes

I see boxing greatness as a seesaw, you lean towards too much on one side, you lose on the other. Floyd picked $$$ more than challenges. Maybe just maybe if he didn't retire and let the WWs beat each other up, people wouldn't complain about him because he backed it up when it mattered.

[STAX ON DECK]

He didn't just fight Morales and Marquez. Floyd easily beat Marquez, I know that but Marquez had to climb how many divisions to fight? Floyd is not a big risk taker. Don't you complain that Broner is too small for 147?

You're going too much into fantasy mode. Fantasy fights shouldn't be a part on judging a boxer's greatness.

Floyd jumped 5 divisions, Pac jumped 7/8. It's easy math.

Whitaker is one of my all time favorite boxers, even he took more risks than Floyd. If Floyd were to of taken more risks, I'd be with Larry and people like you debating against other people.

so if taking risks is all it takes for u to gain everlasting repsect for a fighter why arent you a fan of adrien broner who jumped up two wieght classes to fight tough pressure fighters like maidana and porter?

[Mr.Fantastic]

so if taking risks is all it takes for u to gain everlasting repsect for a fighter why arent you a fan of adrien broner who jumped up two wieght classes to fight tough pressure fighters like maidana and porter?

I give him props for that even if I don't like the fucker. What you don't realize is that people claim him to be the next big thing for beating DeMarco. Really?

[Soda_Popinski]

No, Manny is. Floyd is certainly #2 through with Marquez being #3 and Hopkins at 4th.
Manny has lost some fights in the recent years but his clearly past prime and still hasn't been blown out. People want to try to degrade his accomplishments but their is not denying he has the best resume in boxing today.

Floyd has some good wins but none against prime atg. Plus I don't see how beating smaller men in Manny and Marquez make him better. They were simply fighting a bigger, great fighter.

Pacquiao is the greatest of this generation. No doubt about it. Just FYI, I hated on Pac for a long time.

say what?

Pacquiao lost to Morales/Marquez. It's not just his excitement but his risks, I think he took much greater risks than Floyd. That is why I respect him more. I used to like the younger Floyd, he took more risks. When you follow the money, you lose some of the greatness. Kellerman said something about that and I fully agree.

I see boxing greatness as a seesaw, you lean towards too much on one side, you lose on the other. Floyd picked $$$ more than challenges. Maybe just maybe if he didn't retire and let the WWs beat each other up, people wouldn't complain about him because he backed it up when it mattered.

you seem to have a problem separating fighters you LIKE...and what makes them great...

[Pocket Dogs!]

Yup!!!!!!!

[KillerJones]

Still Pacquiao.

Theres a reason Paulie keeps saying Pac was on PEDs, because what Pac did was seen as impossible.

Pac pulled off one of the greatest boxing feats in history. Thats also why Floyd, Paulie on the rest say hes on Peds. Because it was that incredible. And they're right.

Pac capture our imagination. Floyd just fought past prime fighter after past prime fighter.

[Mr.Fantastic]

say what?





you seem to have a problem separating fighters you LIKE...and what makes them great...

Pacquiao isn't even in my top 25 list of boxers I like. Try again.